[结直肠癌手术后引流液中C反应蛋白动态监测对预测早期吻合口漏的诊断价值]
[Diagnostic value of dynamic monitoring of C-reactive protein in drain drainage to predict early anastomotic leakage after colorectal cancer surgery].
作者信息
Lu Jia, Zheng Lei, Li Runtian, Hao Chunmin, Gao Wenbin, Feng Ziwei, Yin Guangya, Wang Yue
机构信息
Department of Infection Management, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital; National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin 300060, China.
出版信息
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2017 Sep 25;20(9):1055-1059.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the diagnostic value of dynamic monitoring of C-reactive protein (CRP) in drainage fluid in predicting early anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgery.
METHODS
This study enrolled 172 patients, who were diagnosed as colorectal cancer before operation and underwent radical surgery, without residual tumor tissues by postoperative pathology and perioperative infection, at the Tianjin Medical University Cancer Hospital between July 2015 and January 2016. The C-reactive(CRP) protein level in drainage fluid was continuously monitored from postoperative days (POD) 1 to 5. CRP level was compared between anastomotic leakage (AL) group and non-anastomotic leakage (NAL) group. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve was used to estimate the value of monitoring CRP in drainage fluid to predict anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgery.
RESULTS
Among 172 patients, 101 cases were male and 71 cases were female, with age of (59.9±10.3) years. Anastomotic leakage occurred after colorectal surgery in 24 cases(14.0%, AL group ) and other 148 cases were defined as NAL group. Other than body mass index (BMI), differences in baseline data were not statistically significant between two groups. The CRP lever in AL group and NAL group showed rising trend from POD1 to POD4 [Day 1: (6.7±8.4) g/L vs. (8.0±10.6) g/L; Day 2: (24.8±14.6) g/L vs. (28.3±21.1) g/L, Day 3: (54.8±26.5) g/L vs. (53.8±27.6)g/L, Day 4: (62.0±32.2) g/L vs. (58.4±30.7) g/L], while the differences were not significant (all P>0.05). At POD 5, the CRP lever of AL group increased continuously, while that of NAL group decreased with significant difference [(65.3±38.9) g/L vs. (44.7±39.5) g/L, t=-2.85, P=0.005]. Further stratification analysis on AL group revealed CRP level in early AL (AL occurrence <POD 10) showed rising trend from POD 1 to 5, while CRP level in late AL (AL occurrence >POD 10) showed rising trend from POD 1 to 4, then decreased slightly at POD 5, but whose differences were not significant (all P>0.05). ROC curve was drawn with AL condition as state variables and CRP level as test variables. The AUC of POD 1 to 4 was 0.425, 0.487, 0.510, 0.522 respectively and the AUC of POD 5 was the largest, 0.657 (95%CI:0.537-0.777). The largest Youden Index was 0.274. The critical value of CRP was 27.15 g/L. When this value was used as the point of tangency to predict the occurrence of AL, the sensitivity was 87.5%, the specificity was 39.9%, positive predictive value was 19.1%, and negative predictive value was 95.2%.
CONCLUSION
Continuous increase of CRP level in abdominal drainage fluid from POD 1 to POD 5 indicates the occurrence of AL after colorectal cancer operation, especially the detection of CRP level at POD 5 is important.
目的
评估结直肠手术后引流液中C反应蛋白(CRP)动态监测对预测早期吻合口漏的诊断价值。
方法
本研究纳入了172例患者,这些患者术前被诊断为结直肠癌并接受了根治性手术,2015年7月至2016年1月期间在天津医科大学肿瘤医院接受治疗,术后病理检查无残留肿瘤组织且围手术期无感染。从术后第1天(POD)至第5天连续监测引流液中C反应蛋白(CRP)水平。比较吻合口漏(AL)组和无吻合口漏(NAL)组的CRP水平。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评估监测引流液中CRP对预测结直肠手术后吻合口漏的价值。
结果
172例患者中,男性101例,女性71例,年龄为(59.9±10.3)岁。结直肠手术后发生吻合口漏24例(14.0%,AL组),其余148例定义为NAL组。除体重指数(BMI)外,两组基线数据差异无统计学意义。AL组和NAL组的CRP水平从POD1至POD4呈上升趋势[第1天:(6.7±8.4)g/L对(8.0±10.6)g/L;第2天:(24.8±14.6)g/L对(28.3±21.1)g/L,第3天:(54.8±26.5)g/L对(53.8±27.6)g/L,第4天:(62.0±32.2)g/L对(58.4±30.7)g/L],但差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。在POD 5时,AL组的CRP水平持续升高,而NAL组的CRP水平下降,差异有统计学意义[(65.3±38.9)g/L对(44.7±39.5)g/L,t=-2.85,P=0.005]。对AL组进行进一步分层分析显示,早期AL(AL发生在<POD 10)的CRP水平从POD 1至5呈上升趋势,而晚期AL(AL发生在>POD 10)的CRP水平从POD 1至4呈上升趋势,然后在POD 5时略有下降,但其差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。以AL情况为状态变量,CRP水平为检验变量绘制ROC曲线。POD 1至4的AUC分别为0.425、0.487、0.510、0.522,POD 5的AUC最大,为0.657(95%CI:0.537 - 0.777)。最大约登指数为0.274。CRP的临界值为27.15 g/L。以此值作为切点预测AL的发生时,敏感性为87.5%,特异性为39.9%,阳性预测值为19.1%,阴性预测值为95.