Changyong E, Wang Dan, Yu Yang, Liu Hongyu, Ren Hui, Jiang Tao
Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130033, China.
Department of Breast Surgery, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130041, China.
J Cancer Res Ther. 2017;13(4):625-630. doi: 10.4103/jcrt.JCRT_406_17.
The objective of this study is to compare the therapeutic efficacy of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and hepatic resection (HR) for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
A literature search was performed for comparative studies reporting outcomes of both RFA and HR for HCC. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated.
A total of 4812 patients with HCC were included, with 2419 in the RFA group and 2393 in the HR group. The 3- and 5-year overall survival rates in the HR group were significantly higher than those in the RFA group (OR: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.58-0.79, P < 0.00001; OR: 0.57, 95% CI: 0.50-0.65, P < 0.00001, respectively). 1-, 3-, 5-year disease-free survival and correspond recurrence-free survival rates were all better in HR group.
RFA gets promising clinical outcomes for HCC treatments but is not yet comparable to surgery. HR is still the first-line treatment for HCC.
本研究旨在比较射频消融(RFA)与肝切除术(HR)治疗肝细胞癌(HCC)的疗效。
对报告RFA和HR治疗HCC结果的比较研究进行文献检索。计算合并比值比(OR)及95%置信区间(95%CI)。
共纳入4812例HCC患者,其中RFA组2419例,HR组2393例。HR组的3年和5年总生存率显著高于RFA组(OR分别为0.68,95%CI:0.58 - 0.79,P < 0.00001;OR为0.57,95%CI:0.50 - 0.65,P < 0.00001)。HR组的1年、3年、5年无病生存率及相应的无复发生存率均更好。
RFA在HCC治疗中取得了有前景的临床疗效,但仍无法与手术相媲美。HR仍是HCC的一线治疗方法。