在一项日本3期研究中,按基线糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)分层的亚组分析评估度拉糖肽0.75 mg与甘精胰岛素相比在2型糖尿病患者中的疗效和安全性。
Efficacy and safety of subgroup analysis stratified by baseline HbA1c in a Japanese phase 3 study of dulaglutide 0.75 mg compared with insulin glargine in patients with type 2 diabetes.
作者信息
Kaneko Shizuka, Oura Tomonori, Matsui Akiko, Shingaki Tomotaka, Takeuchi Masakazu
机构信息
Takatsuki Red Cross Hospital, Takatsuki, Japan.
Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Kobe, Japan.
出版信息
Endocr J. 2017 Dec 28;64(12):1165-1172. doi: 10.1507/endocrj.EJ17-0189. Epub 2017 Sep 14.
The efficacy and safety of once-weekly dulaglutide 0.75 mg (dulaglutide) compared with once-daily insulin glargine (glargine) in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes were evaluated according to subgroups stratified by baseline glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) (≤8.5% or >8.5%). This exploratory analysis of a randomized, open-label, phase 3 study included 361 patients. In both HbA1c subgroups (patients with baseline HbA1c ≤8.5% or >8.5%), a statistically significantly greater reduction in HbA1c was observed in dulaglutide-treated patients compared with glargine-treated patients after 26 weeks of treatment (HbA1c ≤8.5%: dulaglutide, -1.27%; glargine, -0.72%; HbA1c >8.5%: dulaglutide, -2.04%; glargine, -1.47%; p < 0.001 for both). Mean body weight was decreased from baseline in both subgroups of the dulaglutide group and increased in both subgroups of the glargine group; there were statistically significant differences between the treatment groups in both subgroups (p < 0.05 for both). In both subgroups, similar reductions in fasting blood glucose were observed for dulaglutide- and glargine-treated patients, and a greater reduction in postprandial blood glucose was observed for dulaglutide-treated patients compared with glargine-treated patients. Although dulaglutide increased gastrointestinal adverse events compared with glargine in both subgroups, all gastrointestinal events of diarrhea, nausea, constipation, and vomiting in dulaglutide-treated patients were mild in intensity and well tolerated. In both subgroups, there was a lower incidence of hypoglycemia with dulaglutide than with glargine. Dulaglutide demonstrated significantly greater HbA1c reduction compared with glargine, with an acceptable safety profile, regardless of baseline HbA1c.
根据基线糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)分层的亚组(≤8.5%或>8.5%),评估了日本2型糖尿病患者中每周一次注射0.75mg度拉糖肽(dulaglutide)与每日一次注射甘精胰岛素(glargine)相比的疗效和安全性。这项对一项随机、开放标签的3期研究的探索性分析纳入了361例患者。在两个HbA1c亚组(基线HbA1c≤8.5%或>8.5%的患者)中,治疗26周后,度拉糖肽治疗组患者的HbA1c降低幅度在统计学上显著大于甘精胰岛素治疗组患者(HbA1c≤8.5%:度拉糖肽,-1.27%;甘精胰岛素,-0.72%;HbA1c>8.5%:度拉糖肽,-2.04%;甘精胰岛素,-1.47%;两者p均<0.001)。度拉糖肽组的两个亚组的平均体重均较基线下降,甘精胰岛素组的两个亚组的平均体重均增加;两个亚组中治疗组之间均存在统计学显著差异(两者p均<0.05)。在两个亚组中,度拉糖肽治疗患者和甘精胰岛素治疗患者的空腹血糖均有相似程度的降低,且度拉糖肽治疗患者的餐后血糖降低幅度大于甘精胰岛素治疗患者。尽管在两个亚组中,度拉糖肽组的胃肠道不良事件较甘精胰岛素组有所增加,但度拉糖肽治疗患者的腹泻、恶心、便秘和呕吐等所有胃肠道事件的严重程度均为轻度,且耐受性良好。在两个亚组中,度拉糖肽组低血糖的发生率低于甘精胰岛素组。无论基线HbA1c如何,度拉糖肽与甘精胰岛素相比,HbA1c降低幅度显著更大,且安全性可接受。