Suppr超能文献

研究论文是否提供了关于脑瘫儿童踝足矫形器设计和所用材料的足够信息?一项系统综述。

Do research papers provide enough information on design and material used in ankle foot orthoses for children with cerebral palsy? A systematic review.

作者信息

Eddison N, Mulholland M, Chockalingam N

机构信息

Faculty of Health Sciences, Staffordshire University, Stoke, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Child Orthop. 2017 Aug 1;11(4):263-271. doi: 10.1302/1863-2548.11.160256.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this article is to determine how many of the current peer-reviewed studies of ankle foot or-thoses (AFOs) on children with cerebral palsy (CP) have included adequate details of the design and material of the AFO, to enable the study to be reproduced and outcomes clearly understood.

METHODS

A thorough search of studies published in English was conducted in March 2015, with no restriction on dates, within all major databases using relevant phrases. These searches were then supplemented by tracking all key references from the appropriate articles identified.

STUDY SELECTION

The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) population - children with CP; (2) intervention - AFOs; and (3) outcome measure. One reviewer extracted data regarding the characteristics of the included studies, with the extracted data checked for accuracy and completeness by a second reviewer. None of the studies reviewed gave adequate details of the AFOs. Only 3.6% (n = 2) of papers tested the stiffness. Many studies (54.5%) did not describe the material used nor the material thickness (72.7 %). None of them gave any clinical justification for the chosen design of AFO.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a clear paucity of detail regarding the design and material used in AFOs on studies involving children with CP. Such a lack of detail has the potential to affect the validity of the reported outcomes, the ability to reproduce the studies and may misinform clinical practice.

摘要

目的

本文旨在确定目前针对脑瘫(CP)儿童的踝足矫形器(AFO)的同行评审研究中,有多少包含了AFO设计和材料的充分细节,以便能够重复该研究并清楚理解研究结果。

方法

2015年3月,在所有主要数据库中使用相关短语对以英文发表的研究进行了全面检索,检索无日期限制。然后通过追踪所识别的相关文章中的所有关键参考文献来补充这些检索。

研究选择

纳入标准如下:(1)研究对象——脑瘫儿童;(2)干预措施——AFO;(3)结局指标。由一名评审员提取纳入研究的相关特征数据,另一名评审员检查所提取数据的准确性和完整性。所评审的研究均未给出AFO的充分细节。只有3.6%(n = 2)的论文测试了硬度。许多研究(54.5%)未描述所使用的材料,也未提及材料厚度(72.7%)。它们均未对所选AFO设计给出任何临床依据。

结论

在涉及脑瘫儿童的研究中,关于AFO设计和材料的细节明显匮乏。这种细节的缺失有可能影响所报告结果的有效性、重复研究的能力,并可能误导临床实践。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb0b/5584494/7ccbd30c89d4/jco-11-263-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验