Suppr超能文献

经导管主动脉瓣植入术后双联抗血小板治疗与单药抗血小板治疗:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。

Single versus dual anti-platelet therapy post transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

机构信息

Division of Cardiovascular Disease, Department of Internal Medicine, Harper hospital, Wayne State University, Detroit, USA.

Division of Cardiology, Detroit Medical Center, 3990, John R, Detroit, MI, 48201, USA.

出版信息

J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2017 Nov;44(4):448-456. doi: 10.1007/s11239-017-1550-9.

Abstract

The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the 30-days safety (bleeding and vascular events) and efficacy (reduction in major stroke, myocardial infarction and mortality) of single anti-platelet (SAPT) versus dual anti-platelet (DAPT) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). We used a meta-analytic method with Mantel-Haenszel methods to calculate the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Only randomized clinical trials that compared 30-days safety and efficacy based on Valve Academic Research Consortium criteria were included. Studies that included patients on anticoagulants were excluded. Our analysis included three studies with a total of 421 patients (210 SAPT and 211 DAPT). Life-threatening and major bleeding as well as major vascular complications was similar between SAPT and DAPT. Similarly, major stroke, myocardial infarction and mortality was also comparable between the two groups. The combined outcomes of 30-day mortality, life-threatening and major bleeding showed tendency toward lower event rates in SAPT compared to DAPT (9.5 vs. 15.6%, OR 0.57; 95% CI 0.31-1.03, p = 0.06). In conclusion, SAPT provided similar safety without adding incremental efficacy compared to DAPT but showed tendency of lower combined endpoints of 30-day mortality, life-threatening and major bleeding.

摘要

本系统评价和荟萃分析的目的是评估经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVI)后,单抗血小板(SAPT)与双联抗血小板(DAPT)治疗 30 天的安全性(出血和血管事件)和疗效(减少主要中风、心肌梗死和死亡率)。我们使用荟萃分析方法,采用 Mantel-Haenszel 方法计算优势比(OR)和 95%置信区间(CI)。仅纳入比较基于 Valve Academic Research Consortium 标准的 30 天安全性和疗效的随机临床试验。排除了包括接受抗凝治疗的患者的研究。我们的分析包括三项研究,共有 421 名患者(SAPT 组 210 名,DAPT 组 211 名)。SAPT 和 DAPT 之间,危及生命和大出血以及主要血管并发症的发生率相似。同样,两组之间的主要中风、心肌梗死和死亡率也相当。30 天死亡率、危及生命和大出血的联合结局显示,SAPT 组的发生率低于 DAPT 组(9.5%比 15.6%,OR 0.57;95%CI 0.31-1.03,p=0.06)。总之,SAPT 提供了相似的安全性,而不增加疗效,但在 30 天死亡率、危及生命和大出血的联合终点方面有降低的趋势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验