Suppr超能文献

实验室小鼠中传统和现代检测及方法的评估。 (你提供的原文似乎不完整,“Detecting and in”这里应该有缺失内容)

Evaluation of Traditional and Contemporary Methods for Detecting and in Laboratory Mice.

作者信息

Gerwin Philip M, Ricart Arbona Rodolfo J, Riedel Elyn R, Lepherd Michelle L, Henderson Ken S, Lipman Neil S

机构信息

Tri-Institutional Training Program in Laboratory Animal Medicine and Science, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, and The Rockefeller University, New York, New York, USA; Center for Comparative Medicine and Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, USA; Comparative Medicine, Pfizer Worldwide Research and Development, Groton, Connecticut, USA.

Tri-Institutional Training Program in Laboratory Animal Medicine and Science, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, and The Rockefeller University, Center for Comparative Medicine and Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, USA.

出版信息

J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2017 Jan 1;56(1):32-41.

Abstract

There is no consensus regarding the best practice for detecting murine pinworm infections. Initially, we evaluated 7 fecal concentration methods by using feces containing Aspiculuris tetraptera (AT) eggs (n = 20 samples per method). Sodium nitrate flotation, sodium nitrate centrifugation, Sheather sugar centrifugation, and zinc sulfate centrifugation detected eggs in 100% of samples; zinc sulfate flotation and water sedimentation detected eggs in 90%. All had better detection rates than Sheather sugar flotation (50%). To determine optimal detection methods, Swiss Webster mice were exposed to Syphacia obvelata (SO; n = 60) or AT (n = 60). We compared the following methods at days 0, 30, and 90, beginning 21 or 28 d after SO and AT exposure, respectively: fecal concentration (AT only), anal tape test (SO only), direct examination of intestinal contents (cecum and colon), Swiss roll histology (cecum and colon), and PCR analysis (pooled fur swab and feces). Detection rates for SO-exposed mice were: PCR analysis, 45%; Swiss roll histology, 30%; intestinal content exam, 27%; and tape test, 27%. The SO detection rate for PCR analysis was significantly greater than that for the tape test. Detection rates for AT-exposed mice were: intestinal content exam, 53%; PCR analysis, 33%; fecal flotation, 22%; and Swiss roll histology, 17%. The AT detection rate of PCR analysis combined with intestinal content examination was greater than for PCR analysis only and the AT detection rate of intestinal content examination was greater than for Swiss roll histology. Combining PCR analysis with intestinal content examination detected 100% of infected animals. No single test detected all positive animals. We recommend combining PCR analysis with intestinal content examination for optimal pinworm detection.

摘要

关于检测小鼠蛲虫感染的最佳方法,目前尚无共识。最初,我们通过使用含有四翼无刺线虫(AT)卵的粪便(每种方法20个样本)评估了7种粪便浓缩方法。硝酸钠漂浮法、硝酸钠离心法、希瑟糖离心法和硫酸锌离心法在100%的样本中检测到了虫卵;硫酸锌漂浮法和水沉淀法在90%的样本中检测到了虫卵。所有这些方法的检测率都高于希瑟糖漂浮法(50%)。为了确定最佳检测方法,将瑞士韦伯斯特小鼠暴露于欧氏尖线虫(SO;n = 60)或四翼无刺线虫(AT;n = 60)。我们在分别于暴露于SO和AT后21天或28天开始的第0、30和90天比较了以下方法:粪便浓缩法(仅用于AT)、肛门胶带试验(仅用于SO)、直接检查肠道内容物(盲肠和结肠)、瑞士卷组织学检查(盲肠和结肠)以及PCR分析(合并的皮毛拭子和粪便)。暴露于SO的小鼠的检测率为:PCR分析,45%;瑞士卷组织学检查,30%;肠道内容物检查,27%;胶带试验,27%。PCR分析对SO的检测率显著高于胶带试验。暴露于AT的小鼠的检测率为:肠道内容物检查,53%;PCR分析,33%;粪便漂浮法,22%;瑞士卷组织学检查,17%。PCR分析与肠道内容物检查相结合对AT的检测率高于仅进行PCR分析,且肠道内容物检查对AT的检测率高于瑞士卷组织学检查。将PCR分析与肠道内容物检查相结合检测出了100%的感染动物。没有单一的检测方法能检测出所有阳性动物。我们建议将PCR分析与肠道内容物检查相结合以实现最佳的蛲虫检测。

相似文献

6
Comparison of methods for detection of pinworms in mice and rats.
Lab Anim (NY). 2008 May;37(5):210-5. doi: 10.1038/laban0508-210.
9
Modification of the anal tape method for detection of pinworms in rodents.
Lab Anim (NY). 2001 Nov;30(10):54-5. doi: 10.1038/5000134.

引用本文的文献

1
An Update on the Biologic Effects of Fenbendazole.
Comp Med. 2022 Aug 1;72(4):215-219. doi: 10.30802/AALAS-CM-22-000006. Epub 2022 Jun 28.
2
Evaluation of In-cage Filter Paper as a Replacement for Sentinel Mice in the Detection of Murine Pathogens.
J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2021 Mar 1;60(2):160-167. doi: 10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-20-000086. Epub 2021 Feb 24.
4
PCR and RT-PCR in the Diagnosis of Laboratory Animal Infections and in Health Monitoring.
J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2020 Sep 1;59(5):458-468. doi: 10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-20-000008. Epub 2020 Jun 24.
5
Comparing Mouse Health Monitoring Between Soiled-bedding Sentinel and Exhaust Air Dust Surveillance Programs.
J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2020 Jan 1;59(1):58-66. doi: 10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-19-000061. Epub 2019 Dec 20.

本文引用的文献

8
Diagnosis of ecto- and endoparasites in laboratory rats and mice.
J Vis Exp. 2011 Sep 6(55):e2767. doi: 10.3791/2767.
10
Old enemies, still with us after all these years.
ILAR J. 2008;49(3):291-302. doi: 10.1093/ilar.49.3.291.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验