Becker Torben K, Martin-Gill Christian, Callaway Clifton W, Guyette Francis X, Schott Christopher
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2018 Mar-Apr;22(2):175-179. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2017.1358783. Epub 2017 Sep 14.
Prehospital ultrasound is not yet widely implemented. Most studies report on convenience samples and trauma patients, often by prehospital physicians or critical care clinicians. We assessed the feasibility of paramedic performed prehospital lung ultrasound in medical patients with respiratory distress.
Paramedics at 2 ambulance stations in the city of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA underwent a 2-hour training session in prehospital lung ultrasound using the SonoSite iViz, a handheld ultrasound device. Emergency medical services (EMS) command center (EMS-CC) physicians were instructed in the interpretation of lung ultrasound images. Paramedics enrolled patients presenting with signs and symptoms of respiratory distress over a 3-month period. The ultrasound exam included anterior and lateral views from both sides of the chest. Images were transmitted wirelessly using a mobile hotspot device and uploaded into an online image archiving system. Images were interpreted remotely by the EMS-CC physicians, and 2 expert sonographers provided an overread. We assessed agreement between EMS-CC physicians and experts, as well as between chart-review derived ED diagnosis and both EMS-CC physician and expert interpretation. We defined four a priori hypotheses that would need to be met for the intervention to be considered "feasible."
A total of 34 of 78 (43.6%) eligible patients had an ultrasound exam completed. Image transmission was successful in 25 (73.5%) of cases where ultrasound was performed. The primary reason for not enrolling an otherwise eligible patient was equipment failure (25.0%), followed by patient acuity and patient refusal (18.2% each). A total of 20 (58.8%) completed scans were deemed uninterpretable upon expert review. Agreement between EMS physicians and experts was poor. Agreement between EMS-CC physicians and ED diagnosis, as well as between experts and ED diagnosis, was fair. The predetermined thresholds for feasibility were not met.
Paramedic performed prehospital lung ultrasound for patients with respiratory distress and remote interpretation by EMS physicians did not meet the predetermined thresholds to be considered "feasible" in a real-world environment with currently available technologies. This study identified important barriers to the implementation of prehospital lung ultrasound, which should be addressed in future studies.
院前超声尚未得到广泛应用。大多数研究报告的是便利样本和创伤患者,通常由院前医生或重症监护临床医生进行。我们评估了护理人员对有呼吸窘迫的内科患者进行院前肺部超声检查的可行性。
美国宾夕法尼亚州匹兹堡市2个救护站的护理人员使用手持式超声设备SonoSite iViz接受了为期2小时的院前肺部超声培训课程。急诊医疗服务(EMS)指挥中心(EMS-CC)的医生接受了肺部超声图像解读的指导。护理人员在3个月的时间里招募了有呼吸窘迫体征和症状的患者。超声检查包括胸部两侧的前视图和侧视图。图像使用移动热点设备无线传输,并上传到在线图像存档系统。图像由EMS-CC医生进行远程解读,2名专家超声医师进行复核。我们评估了EMS-CC医生与专家之间的一致性,以及基于病历审查得出的急诊科诊断与EMS-CC医生和专家解读之间的一致性。我们定义了四个先验假设,干预措施要被认为“可行”就需要满足这些假设。
78名符合条件的患者中有34名(43.6%)完成了超声检查。在进行超声检查成功的25例(73.5%)中,图像传输成功。未纳入其他符合条件患者的主要原因是设备故障(25.0%),其次是患者病情严重程度和患者拒绝(各占18.2%)。专家审查后,共有20例(58.8%)完成的扫描被认为无法解读。EMS医生与专家之间的一致性较差。EMS-CC医生与急诊科诊断之间以及专家与急诊科诊断之间的一致性一般。未达到可行性的预定阈值。
护理人员对有呼吸窘迫的患者进行院前肺部超声检查并由EMS医生进行远程解读,在当前可用技术的现实环境中未达到被认为“可行”的预定阈值。本研究确定了院前肺部超声实施中的重要障碍,未来研究应加以解决。