在没有神经调节剂的情况下,脊柱推拿不影响压痛阈值:一项随机对照试验。
Spinal manipulation does not affect pressure pain thresholds in the absence of neuromodulators: a randomized controlled trial.
作者信息
Jordon Max K, Beattie Paul F, D'Urso Sarah, Scriven Sarah
机构信息
Department of Exercise Science, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
出版信息
J Man Manip Ther. 2017 Sep;25(4):172-181. doi: 10.1080/10669817.2016.1230352. Epub 2016 Sep 12.
BACKGROUND
Measurement of pressure pain threshold (PPT) is a way to determine one of the many potential treatment effects of spinal manipulative therapy.
OBJECTIVE
To determine how multiple spinal manipulations administered in a single-session affected PPTs at local and distal sites in asymptomatic individuals.
METHODS
Participants were randomly assigned into one of three groups: Group one ( = 18) received a lumbar manipulation followed by a cervical manipulation. Group two ( = 17) received a cervical manipulation followed by a lumbar manipulation. The control group ( = 19) received two bouts of five minutes of rest. At baseline and after each intervention or rest period, each participant's PPTs were obtained using a handheld algometer. The PPTs were tested bilaterally over the lateral epicondyles of the humerus and over the mid-bellies of the upper trapezius, lumbar paraspinal, and the tibialis anterior muscles. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, and its Identifier is NCT02828501.
RESULTS
Repeated-measures ANOVAs and Kruskal-Wallis tests showed no significant within- or between-group differences in PPT. Within-group effect sizes in the changes of PPT ranged from -.48 at the left paraspinal muscles to .24 at the left lateral humeral epicondyle. Statistical power to detect significant differences at of 0.05 was calculated to be 0.94.
CONCLUSIONS
This study suggests that in young adults who do not have current or recent symptoms of spinal pain, multiple within-session treatments of cervical and lumbar spinal manipulation fail to influence PPTs. Changes in PPT that are observed in symptomatic individuals are likely to be primarily influenced by pain-related neuromodulators rather than by an isolated, mechanical effect of spinal manipulation.
背景
压力疼痛阈值(PPT)的测量是确定脊柱手法治疗众多潜在治疗效果之一的一种方法。
目的
确定在单次治疗中进行多次脊柱手法治疗对无症状个体局部和远端部位PPT的影响。
方法
参与者被随机分为三组之一:第一组(n = 18)先接受腰椎手法治疗,然后接受颈椎手法治疗。第二组(n = 17)先接受颈椎手法治疗,然后接受腰椎手法治疗。对照组(n = 19)接受两次五分钟的休息。在基线以及每次干预或休息期后,使用手持式压力痛觉计获取每位参与者的PPT。在肱骨外上髁、上斜方肌肌腹中部、腰椎旁肌和胫骨前肌双侧测试PPT。本研究已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册,其标识符为NCT02828501。
结果
重复测量方差分析和克鲁斯卡尔 - 沃利斯检验显示,PPT在组内或组间均无显著差异。PPT变化的组内效应大小范围从左椎旁肌的-.48到左肱骨外上髁的.24。计算得出在α = 0.05时检测显著差异的统计功效为0.94。
结论
本研究表明,在目前没有脊柱疼痛症状或近期没有脊柱疼痛症状的年轻成年人中,颈椎和腰椎脊柱手法的多次单次治疗未能影响PPT。在有症状个体中观察到的PPT变化可能主要受疼痛相关神经调节剂的影响,而非脊柱手法的孤立机械效应。