• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

激光视力矫正术后角膜扩张症的角膜交联术综述与荟萃分析

A review and meta-analysis of corneal cross-linking for post-laser vision correction ectasia.

作者信息

Wan Qi, Wang Dan, Ye HongQuan, Tang Jing, Han Yu

机构信息

The People's Hospital of Leshan, Leshan City, China.

出版信息

J Curr Ophthalmol. 2017 Mar 15;29(3):145-153. doi: 10.1016/j.joco.2017.02.008. eCollection 2017 Sep.

DOI:10.1016/j.joco.2017.02.008
PMID:28913504
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5587251/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to review the safety and stability of cornea cross-linking (CXL) for the treatment of keratectasia after Excimer Laser Refractive Surgery.

METHODS

Eligible studies were identified by systematically searching PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and reference lists. Meta-analysis was performed using Stata 12.1 software. The primary outcome parameters included the changes of corrected distant visual acuity (CDVA), uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), the maximum keratometry value (Kmax) and minimum keratometry value (Kmin), the surface regularity index (SRI), the surface asymmetry index (SAI), the keratoconus prediction index (KPI), corneal thickness, and endothelial cell count. Efficacy estimates were evaluated by weighted mean difference (WMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for absolute changes of the interested outcomes.

RESULTS

Seven studies involving 118 patients treated with CXL for progressive ectasia after laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) or photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) (140 eyes; the follow-up time range from 12 to 62 months) were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled results showed that there were no significant differences in Kmax and Kmin values after CXL (WMD = 0.584; 95% CI: -0.289 to 1.458;  = 0.19; WMD = 0.466; 95% CI: -0.625 to 1.556;  = 0.403, respectively). The CDVA improved significantly after CXL (WMD = 0.045; 95% CI: 0.010 to 0.079;  = 0.011), whereas UCVA did not differ statistically (WMD = 0.011; 95% CI: -0.055 to 0.077;  = 0.746). The changes were not statistically significant in SRI, SAI, and KPI (WMD = 0.116; 95% CI: -0.090 to 0.322;  = 0.269; WMD = 0.240; 95% CI: -0.200 to 0.681;  = 0.285; WMD = 0.045; 95% CI: -0.001 to 0.090;  = 0.056, respectively). Endothelial cell count and corneal thickness did not deteriorate (WMD = 12.634; 95% CI: -29.460 to 54.729;  = 0.556; WMD = 0.657; 95% CI: -9.402 to 10.717;  = 0.898, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The study showed that CXL is a promising treatment to stabilize the keratectasia after Excimer Laser Refractive Surgery. Further long-term follow-up studies are necessary to assess the persistence of the effect of the CXL.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在回顾角膜交联术(CXL)治疗准分子激光屈光手术后角膜扩张的安全性和稳定性。

方法

通过系统检索PubMed、Embase、Web of Science及参考文献列表来确定符合条件的研究。使用Stata 12.1软件进行荟萃分析。主要结局参数包括矫正远视力(CDVA)、未矫正视力(UCVA)、最大角膜曲率值(Kmax)和最小角膜曲率值(Kmin)、表面规则性指数(SRI)、表面不对称指数(SAI)、圆锥角膜预测指数(KPI)、角膜厚度和内皮细胞计数。通过加权均数差(WMD)和95%置信区间(CI)评估感兴趣结局的绝对变化的疗效估计值。

结果

荟萃分析纳入了7项研究,共118例接受CXL治疗激光原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)或准分子激光角膜切削术(PRK)后进展性角膜扩张的患者(140只眼;随访时间为12至62个月)。汇总结果显示,CXL术后Kmax和Kmin值无显著差异(WMD = 0.584;95% CI:-0.289至1.458;P = 0.19;WMD = 0.466;95% CI:-0.625至1.556;P = 0.403)。CXL术后CDVA显著改善(WMD = 0.045;95% CI:0.010至0.079;P = 0.011),而UCVA无统计学差异(WMD = 0.011;95% CI:-0.055至0.077;P = 0.746)。SRI、SAI和KPI的变化无统计学意义(WMD = 0.116;95% CI:-0.090至0.322;P = 0.269;WMD = 0.240;95% CI:-0.200至0.681;P = 0.285;WMD = 0.045;95% CI:-0.001至0.090;P = 0.056)。内皮细胞计数和角膜厚度没有恶化(WMD = 12.634;95% CI:-29.460至54.729;P = 0.556;WMD = 0.657;95% CI:-9.402至10.717;P = 0.898)。

结论

该研究表明,CXL是稳定准分子激光屈光手术后角膜扩张的一种有前景的治疗方法。需要进一步的长期随访研究来评估CXL效果的持久性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a192/5587251/00e1e4176113/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a192/5587251/61b16281abda/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a192/5587251/f09b291a718d/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a192/5587251/845befc05cd0/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a192/5587251/6b9c3696ecfe/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a192/5587251/00e1e4176113/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a192/5587251/61b16281abda/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a192/5587251/f09b291a718d/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a192/5587251/845befc05cd0/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a192/5587251/6b9c3696ecfe/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a192/5587251/00e1e4176113/gr5.jpg

相似文献

1
A review and meta-analysis of corneal cross-linking for post-laser vision correction ectasia.激光视力矫正术后角膜扩张症的角膜交联术综述与荟萃分析
J Curr Ophthalmol. 2017 Mar 15;29(3):145-153. doi: 10.1016/j.joco.2017.02.008. eCollection 2017 Sep.
2
Efficacy of corneal collagen cross-linking for treatment of keratoconus: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.角膜胶原交联术治疗圆锥角膜的疗效:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2015 May 18;10(5):e0127079. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127079. eCollection 2015.
3
Corneal Collagen Crosslinking Combined with Phototherapeutic Keratectomy and Photorefractive Keratectomy for Corneal Ectasia after Laser in situ Keratomileusis.角膜胶原交联联合光治疗性角膜切削术和准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术治疗准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术后角膜扩张症
Ophthalmic Res. 2018;59(3):135-141. doi: 10.1159/000480242. Epub 2018 Jan 17.
4
Long-Term Comparison of Simultaneous Topography-Guided Photorefractive Keratectomy Followed by Corneal Cross-linking versus Corneal Cross-linking Alone. topography-guided 准分子激光角膜切削术联合角膜交联术与单纯角膜交联术的长期疗效比较
Ophthalmology. 2016 May;123(5):974-83. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.01.010. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
5
Accelerated Versus Conventional Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking in the Treatment of Keratoconus: A Meta-analysis and Review of the Literature.加速与常规角膜胶原交联治疗圆锥角膜:荟萃分析及文献复习。
Interdiscip Sci. 2019 Jun;11(2):282-286. doi: 10.1007/s12539-019-00336-9. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
6
Long term efficacy and stability of corneal collagen cross linking for post-LASIK ectasia: an average of 80mo follow-up.准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术后角膜扩张症患者角膜胶原交联的长期疗效和稳定性:平均80个月随访
Int J Ophthalmol. 2019 Feb 18;12(2):333-337. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2019.02.22. eCollection 2019.
7
Efficacy and safety of transepithelial corneal collagen crosslinking surgery versus standard corneal collagen crosslinking surgery for keratoconus: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.经上皮角膜胶原交联手术与标准角膜胶原交联手术治疗圆锥角膜的疗效和安全性:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
BMC Ophthalmol. 2017 Dec 28;17(1):262. doi: 10.1186/s12886-017-0657-2.
8
Meta-analysis: clinical outcomes of laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy and photorefractive keratectomy in myopia.Meta 分析:激光辅助上皮下角膜切除术和光折射性角膜切削术治疗近视的临床疗效。
Ophthalmology. 2010 Oct;117(10):1912-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.02.004. Epub 2010 Aug 14.
9
Long-Term Follow-Up of Accelerated Transepithelial Corneal Crosslinking for Post-LASIK Ectasia: A Pilot Prospective Observational Study.准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术后角膜扩张症的加速上皮角膜交联长期随访:一项前瞻性观察性试点研究
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021 Dec 22;9:809262. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.809262. eCollection 2021.
10
Corneal Collagen Crosslinking for Ectasia After Refractive Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.屈光手术后角膜扩张的角膜胶原交联:系统评价与荟萃分析
Clin Ophthalmol. 2024 Mar 19;18:865-879. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S451232. eCollection 2024.

引用本文的文献

1
Application of Surgical Protocols for the Treatment of Highly Irregular Astigmatism with Topographic Guided Ablation in a Case of Post-LASIK Ectasia.手术方案在角膜地形图引导下消融治疗LASIK术后角膜扩张症高度不规则散光病例中的应用
Int Med Case Rep J. 2025 Jan 15;18:91-98. doi: 10.2147/IMCRJ.S476407. eCollection 2025.
2
Corneal Collagen Crosslinking for Ectasia After Refractive Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.屈光手术后角膜扩张的角膜胶原交联:系统评价与荟萃分析
Clin Ophthalmol. 2024 Mar 19;18:865-879. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S451232. eCollection 2024.
3
Insights into the rotational stability of toric intraocular lens implantation: diagnostic approaches, influencing factors and intervention strategies.

本文引用的文献

1
Efficacy of Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking for the Treatment of Keratoconus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.角膜胶原交联治疗圆锥角膜的疗效:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Cornea. 2016 Mar;35(3):417-28. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000000723.
2
Central corneal sensitivity after small incision lenticule extraction versus femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK for myopia: a meta-analysis of comparative studies.小切口透镜切除术与飞秒激光辅助LASIK治疗近视后的中央角膜敏感性:一项比较研究的荟萃分析
BMC Ophthalmol. 2015 Oct 24;15:141. doi: 10.1186/s12886-015-0129-5.
3
Accelerated Corneal Collagen Cross-linking for Postoperative LASIK Ectasia: Two-Year Outcomes.
关于散光人工晶状体植入旋转稳定性的见解:诊断方法、影响因素及干预策略。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Feb 13;11:1349496. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1349496. eCollection 2024.
4
The Importance of Using CBI-LVC for Detecting Ectasia in Post-Refractive Eyes.使用CBI-LVC检测屈光术后眼扩张的重要性。
Beyoglu Eye J. 2023 Sep 13;8(3):237-238. doi: 10.14744/bej.2023.82542. eCollection 2023.
5
The 25th Anniversary of Laser Vision Correction in the United States.美国激光视力矫正25周年。
Clin Ophthalmol. 2021 Mar 17;15:1163-1172. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S299752. eCollection 2021.
6
Accelerated versus standard corneal cross linking in the treatment of ectasia post refractive surgery and penetrating keratoplasty: a medium term randomized trial.加速角膜交联与标准角膜交联治疗屈光手术后及穿透性角膜移植术后角膜扩张症的中期随机试验
Int J Ophthalmol. 2019 Nov 18;12(11):1714-1719. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2019.11.08. eCollection 2019.
7
Reliability of the Evidence Addressing Treatment of Corneal Diseases: A Summary of Systematic Reviews.评估角膜疾病治疗方法的证据的可靠性:系统评价综述。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2019 Jul 1;137(7):775-785. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2019.1063.
8
Thirty-month results after the treatment of post-LASIK ectasia with allogenic lenticule addition and corneal cross-linking: a case report.同种异体透镜植入联合角膜交联治疗准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术后角膜扩张30个月的结果:病例报告
BMC Ophthalmol. 2018 Nov 12;18(1):294. doi: 10.1186/s12886-018-0967-z.
用于LASIK术后角膜扩张的加速角膜胶原交联:两年随访结果
J Refract Surg. 2015 Jun;31(6):380-4. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20150521-04.
4
Efficacy of corneal collagen cross-linking for treatment of keratoconus: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.角膜胶原交联术治疗圆锥角膜的疗效:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2015 May 18;10(5):e0127079. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127079. eCollection 2015.
5
Corneal collagen crosslinking for ectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis: long-term results.准分子原位角膜磨镶术后角膜扩张的角膜胶原交联:长期结果
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014 Oct;40(10):1591-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.01.042. Epub 2014 Aug 28.
6
Corneal collagen cross-linking in keratoconus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.圆锥角膜的角膜胶原交联:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2014 Jul 10;4:5652. doi: 10.1038/srep05652.
7
Accelerated versus conventional corneal collagen crosslinking.加速与传统角膜胶原交联
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014 Jun;40(6):1013-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.12.012.
8
Ex-PRESS implantation versus trabeculectomy in uncontrolled glaucoma: a meta-analysis.Ex-PRESS 植入术与小梁切除术治疗未控制青光眼的Meta 分析。
PLoS One. 2013 May 31;8(5):e63591. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0063591. Print 2013.
9
Corneal collagen cross-linking for ectasia after LASIK and photorefractive keratectomy: long-term results.LASIK 和光性折射性角膜切削术后角膜扩张症的胶原交联:长期结果。
Ophthalmology. 2013 Jul;120(7):1354-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.12.027. Epub 2013 Apr 10.
10
Corneal collagen crosslinking for corneal ectasia of post-LASIK: one-year results.准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术后角膜扩张症的角膜胶原交联:一年结果
Int J Ophthalmol. 2012;5(2):190-5. doi: 10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2012.02.15. Epub 2012 Apr 18.