1 Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
2 Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2017 Nov;43(11):1503-1518. doi: 10.1177/0146167217722557. Epub 2017 Aug 11.
Three studies examined the relationship between people's moral values (drawing on moral foundations theory) and their willingness to censor immoral acts from children. Results revealed that diverse moral values did not predict censorship judgments. It was not the case that participants who valued loyalty and authority, respectively, sought to censor depictions of disloyal and disobedient acts. Rather, censorship intentions were predicted by a single moral value-sanctity. The more people valued sanctity, the more willing they were to censor from children, regardless of the types of violations depicted (impurity, disloyalty, disobedience, etc.). Furthermore, people who valued sanctity objected to indecent exposure only to apparently innocent and pure children-those who were relatively young and who had not been previously exposed to immoral acts. These data suggest that sanctity, purity, and the preservation of innocence underlie intentions to censor from young children.
三项研究考察了人们的道德价值观(基于道德基础理论)与他们对儿童审查不道德行为的意愿之间的关系。结果表明,不同的道德价值观并不能预测审查判断。那些分别重视忠诚和权威的参与者并不寻求审查不忠诚和不服从的行为的描述。相反,审查意图是由单一的道德价值观——神圣性来预测的。人们越重视神圣性,他们就越愿意从孩子那里审查内容,而不管所描述的违规类型如何(不纯洁、不忠诚、不服从等)。此外,重视神圣性的人只反对猥亵暴露给那些明显无辜和纯洁的孩子——那些相对年轻且以前没有接触过不道德行为的孩子。这些数据表明,神圣性、纯洁性和对纯真的保护是对年幼孩子进行审查的意图的基础。