Suppr超能文献

疾病认知解释慢性下腰痛患者功能残疾的差异,但不能解释习惯性身体活动的差异:一项横断面研究。

Illness Perceptions Explain the Variance in Functional Disability, but Not Habitual Physical Activity, in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain: A Cross-Sectional Study.

作者信息

Leysen Marijke, Nijs Jo, Van Wilgen C Paul, Struyf Filip, Meeus Mira, Fransen Erik, Demoulin Christophe, Smeets Rob J E M, Roussel Nathalie A

机构信息

Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy (REVAKI), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.

Pain in Motion International Research Group.

出版信息

Pain Pract. 2018 Apr;18(4):523-531. doi: 10.1111/papr.12642. Epub 2017 Oct 26.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Although the importance of psychosocial factors has been highlighted in many studies in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP), there is a lack of research examining the role of illness perceptions in explaining functional disability and physical activity in patients with CLBP.

AIM

The aim of the study was to explore the value of illness perceptions in explaining functional disability and physical activity in patients with CLBP.

METHODS

Eighty-four participants with CLBP (of > 3 months' duration) completed a battery of questionnaires investigating psychosocial factors (Pain Catastrophizing Scale [PCS], Illness Perceptions Questionnaire Revised [IPQ-R], and 36-Item Short Form mental health scale [SF-36_MH]) and perceived pain intensity (visual analog scale [VAS]), as well as the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Baecke questionnaire. The latter 2 were entered separately as dependent variables in a regression analysis.

RESULTS

The combined variables (VAS, PCS, SF-36_MH, IPQ-R) accounted for 62% of the variance in functional disability (ODI). Adding the results of the IPQ-R to the scores of the other 3 variables (VAS, PCS, SF-36_MH) significantly increased the explained variance of ODI scores in CLBP patients, yielding 18% additional information (P < 0.01). Only 5% of the variance in the Baecke questionnaire was explained by combining the 4 variables. None of the single variables alone made a significant contribution to R².

CONCLUSIONS

Illness perceptions are an important factor for explaining functional disability, but not for explaining habitual physical activity in CLBP patients.

摘要

引言

尽管心理社会因素在许多慢性下腰痛(CLBP)患者的研究中已得到强调,但缺乏研究探讨疾病认知在解释CLBP患者功能障碍和身体活动方面的作用。

目的

本研究的目的是探讨疾病认知在解释CLBP患者功能障碍和身体活动方面的价值。

方法

84名CLBP持续时间超过3个月的参与者完成了一系列问卷调查,调查心理社会因素(疼痛灾难化量表[PCS]、修订版疾病认知问卷[IPQ-R]和36项简短心理健康量表[SF-36_MH])和疼痛强度感知(视觉模拟量表[VAS]),以及Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)和Baecke问卷。后两者在回归分析中分别作为因变量输入。

结果

综合变量(VAS、PCS、SF-36_MH、IPQ-R)解释了功能障碍(ODI)中62%的方差。将IPQ-R的结果添加到其他3个变量(VAS、PCS、SF-36_MH)的得分中,显著增加了CLBP患者ODI得分的解释方差,提供了18%的额外信息(P<0.01)。将这4个变量组合起来,仅解释了Baecke问卷中5%的方差。没有一个单一变量对R²有显著贡献。

结论

疾病认知是解释功能障碍的重要因素,但不是解释CLBP患者习惯性身体活动的重要因素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验