Aziz May T, Kakadiya Payal P, Kush Samantha M, Weigel Kylie, Lowe Denise K
1 Virginia Commonwealth University Health System/Medical College of Virginia Hospitals, Richmond, VA, USA.
2 Virginia Commonwealth University School of Pharmacy, Richmond, VA, USA.
Ann Pharmacother. 2018 Feb;52(2):166-174. doi: 10.1177/1060028017732586. Epub 2017 Sep 15.
To review the efficacy and safety of defibrotide as well as its pharmacology, mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics (PK), drug-drug interactions, dosing, cost considerations, and place in therapy.
A PubMed search was performed through August 2017 using the terms defibrotide, oligonucleotide, hepatic veno-occlusive disease (VOD), sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS), and hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Other data sources were from references of identified studies, review articles, and conference abstracts plus manufacturer product labeling and website, the Food and Drug Administration website, and clinicaltrials.gov.
English-language trials that examined defibrotide's pharmacodynamics, mechanism, PK, efficacy, safety, dosing, and cost-effectiveness were included.
Trials have confirmed the safety and efficacy of defibrotide for treatment of VOD/SOS in adult and pediatric HCT patients, with complete response rates and day +100 overall survival rates ranging from 25.5% to 76% and 35% to 64%, respectively. The British Committee for Standards in Haematology/British Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation Guidelines recommend defibrotide prophylaxis in pediatric and adult HCT patients with risk factors for VOD/SOS; however, its prophylactic use in the United States is controversial. Although there are efficacy data to support this strategy, cost-effectiveness data have not shown it to be cost-effective. Defibrotide has manageable toxicities, with low rates of grade 3 to 4 adverse effects.
Defibrotide is the first medication approved in the United States for the treatment of adults and children with hepatic VOD/SOS, with renal or pulmonary dysfunction following HCT. Data evaluating defibrotide for VOD/SOS prevention are conflicting and have not shown cost-effectiveness.
综述去纤苷的疗效、安全性及其药理学、作用机制、药代动力学(PK)、药物相互作用、给药剂量、成本考量以及在治疗中的地位。
通过在PubMed上检索至2017年8月,使用的检索词为去纤苷、寡核苷酸、肝静脉闭塞病(VOD)、窦性阻塞综合征(SOS)和造血干细胞移植(HCT)。其他数据来源包括已识别研究的参考文献、综述文章、会议摘要,以及制造商产品标签和网站、美国食品药品监督管理局网站和clinicaltrials.gov。
纳入了研究去纤苷药效学、作用机制、PK、疗效、安全性、给药剂量和成本效益的英文试验。
试验已证实去纤苷治疗成人和儿童造血干细胞移植患者的VOD/SOS具有安全性和有效性,完全缓解率和第100天总生存率分别为25.5%至76%和35%至64%。英国血液学标准委员会/英国血液与骨髓移植学会指南建议,对有VOD/SOS危险因素的儿童和成人造血干细胞移植患者进行去纤苷预防;然而,其在美国的预防性使用存在争议。尽管有疗效数据支持这一策略,但成本效益数据并未表明其具有成本效益。去纤苷的毒性易于管理,3至4级不良反应发生率较低。
去纤苷是美国首个获批用于治疗造血干细胞移植后出现肝VOD/SOS且伴有肾或肺功能障碍的成人和儿童的药物。评估去纤苷预防VOD/SOS的数据存在矛盾,且未显示出成本效益。