Suppr超能文献

胰腺导管腺癌中肿瘤特异性成像最佳分子靶点的选择

Selection of optimal molecular targets for tumor-specific imaging in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

作者信息

Tummers Willemieke S, Farina-Sarasqueta Arantza, Boonstra Martin C, Prevoo Hendrica A, Sier Cornelis F, Mieog Jan S, Morreau Johannes, van Eijck Casper H, Kuppen Peter J, van de Velde Cornelis J, Bonsing Bert A, Vahrmeijer Alexander L, Swijnenburg Rutger-Jan

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Oncotarget. 2017 May 26;8(34):56816-56828. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.18232. eCollection 2017 Aug 22.

Abstract

Discrimination of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) from chronic pancreatitis (CP) or peritumoral inflammation is challenging, both at preoperative imaging and during surgery, but it is crucial for proper therapy selection. Tumor-specific molecular imaging aims to enhance this discrimination and to help select and stratify patients for resection. We evaluated various biomarkers for the specific identification of PDAC and associated lymph node metastases. Using immunohistochemistry (IHC), expression levels and patterns were investigated of integrin αvβ6, carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecule 5 (CEACAM5), Cathepsin E (Cath E), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), hepatocyte growth factor receptor (c-MET), thymocyte differentiation antigen 1 (Thy1), and urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR). In a first cohort, multiple types of pancreatic tissue were evaluated (n=62); normal pancreatic tissue (n=8), CP (n=7), PDAC (n=9), tumor associated lymph nodes (n=32), and PDAC after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy (n=6). In a second cohort, tissues were investigated (n=55) with IHC and immunofluorescence (IF) for concordance of biomarker expression in all tissue types, obtained from an individual patient. Integrin αvβ6 and CEACAM5 showed significantly higher expression levels in PDAC versus normal pancreatic tissue (P=0.001 and P<0.001, respectively) and CP (P=0.003 and P<0.001, respectively). Avβ6 and CEACAM5 expression identified tumor-positive lymph nodes correctly in 84% and 68%, respectively, and in 100% of tumor-negative nodes for both biomarkers. In conclusion, αvβ6 and CEACAM5 are excellent biomarkers to differentiate PDAC from surrounding tissue and to identify lymph node metastases. Individually or combined, these biomarkers are promising targets for tumor-specific molecular imaging of PDAC.

摘要

在术前影像学检查和手术过程中,区分胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)与慢性胰腺炎(CP)或肿瘤周围炎症都具有挑战性,但这对于正确选择治疗方法至关重要。肿瘤特异性分子成像旨在加强这种区分,并有助于选择患者进行切除手术并对其进行分层。我们评估了多种生物标志物,用于PDAC及相关淋巴结转移的特异性识别。采用免疫组织化学(IHC)方法,研究了整合素αvβ6、癌胚抗原相关细胞粘附分子5(CEACAM5)、组织蛋白酶E(Cath E)、表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)、肝细胞生长因子受体(c-MET)、胸腺细胞分化抗原1(Thy1)和尿激酶型纤溶酶原激活物受体(uPAR)的表达水平和模式。在第一个队列中,评估了多种类型的胰腺组织(n = 62);正常胰腺组织(n = 8)、CP(n = 7)、PDAC(n = 9)、肿瘤相关淋巴结(n = 32)以及新辅助放化疗后的PDAC(n = 6)。在第二个队列中,对从一名个体患者获取的所有组织类型进行了IHC和免疫荧光(IF)检查(n = 55),以研究生物标志物表达的一致性。与正常胰腺组织相比,整合素αvβ6和CEACAM5在PDAC中的表达水平显著更高(分别为P = 0.001和P < 0.001),与CP相比也显著更高(分别为P = 0.003和P < 0.001)。αvβ6和CEACAM5表达分别在84%和68%的肿瘤阳性淋巴结中正确识别,并且在两种生物标志物的100%肿瘤阴性淋巴结中正确识别。总之,αvβ6和CEACAM5是区分PDAC与周围组织以及识别淋巴结转移的优秀生物标志物。单独或联合使用,这些生物标志物都是PDAC肿瘤特异性分子成像的有前景的靶点。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b65/5593604/df49891c339f/oncotarget-08-56816-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验