Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2017 Nov-Dec;5(6):1556-1563. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2017.07.027. Epub 2017 Sep 12.
Rituximab (RTX) is approved for induction therapy of granulomatosis with polyangiitis and microscopic polyangiitis. In eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA), organ-threatening manifestations are mainly treated with cyclophosphamide (CYC). RTX as treatment in EGPA has been described in small case series; however long-term data and the efficacy of RTX in EGPA refractory to CYC have not been reported yet.
To investigate the efficacy and safety of RTX and conventional immunosuppressive therapy with CYC in EGPA as induction therapy and during long-term follow-up.
Retrospective analysis of 28 patients with EGPA was done. Treatment response and disease activity were determined by Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score, C-reactive protein, eosinophils, antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody, and peripheral CD19 B cells.
Fourteen patients with EGPA treated with RTX were compared with 14 age- and sex-matched patients with EGPA treated with CYC for remission induction; 64% of the RTX-treated patients with EGPA had previously failed CYC treatment. Disease duration was longer and the number of previous immunosuppressants higher in RTX-treated patients. Five RTX-treated patients (36%) and 4 CYC-treated patients (29%) achieved complete remission. All other patients were in partial remission. There was no difference between both groups in respect to treatment response and partial and complete remission. In both treatment groups, eosinophils, C-reactive protein, and IgE levels dropped. Relapse-free survival within an observation period of 36 months was comparable between RTX- and CYC-treated patients. RTX was well tolerated, but resulted in a decline in serum immunoglobulin levels.
RTX was effective in inducing remission and during long-term follow-up in patients with EGPA, even when previously refractory to standard immunosuppressive therapy including CYC. RTX-treated patients should be monitored for hypogammaglobulinemia.
利妥昔单抗(RTX)获批用于肉芽肿性多血管炎和显微镜下多血管炎的诱导治疗。在嗜酸性肉芽肿性多血管炎(EGPA)中,主要用环磷酰胺(CYC)治疗有器官威胁的表现。RTX 治疗 EGPA 已在小病例系列中描述;然而,尚未报道 RTX 在 EGPA 对 CYC 耐药患者中的长期数据和疗效。
研究 RTX 和 CYC 常规免疫抑制疗法作为诱导治疗和长期随访期间在 EGPA 中的疗效和安全性。
对 28 例 EGPA 患者进行回顾性分析。通过 Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score、C 反应蛋白、嗜酸性粒细胞、抗中性粒细胞胞质抗体和外周血 CD19 B 细胞来确定治疗反应和疾病活动。
将 14 例 EGPA 患者用 RTX 治疗与 14 例年龄和性别匹配的用 CYC 治疗的 EGPA 患者进行缓解诱导治疗进行比较;RTX 治疗的 EGPA 患者中有 64%之前曾接受过 CYC 治疗失败。RTX 治疗的患者疾病持续时间更长,之前使用的免疫抑制剂更多。5 例 RTX 治疗的患者(36%)和 4 例 CYC 治疗的患者(29%)达到完全缓解。所有其他患者处于部分缓解。两组之间在治疗反应、部分和完全缓解方面没有差异。在两组治疗中,嗜酸性粒细胞、C 反应蛋白和 IgE 水平均下降。在 36 个月的观察期内,RTX 和 CYC 治疗的患者无复发生存率相当。RTX 耐受良好,但导致血清免疫球蛋白水平下降。
RTX 在诱导缓解和 EGPA 的长期随访中是有效的,即使在先前对包括 CYC 在内的标准免疫抑制治疗耐药的情况下也是如此。应监测接受 RTX 治疗的患者是否出现低丙种球蛋白血症。