Luo Jing, Jin Di-Er, Yang Guo-Yan, Zhang Ying-Ze, Wang Jian-Ming, Kong Wei-Ping, Tao Qing-Wen
Traditional Chinese Medicine Department of Rheumatism, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Yinghua East Road No. 2, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100029, China.
National Institute of Complementary Medicine, Western Sydney University, Sydney 2560, Australia.
Complement Ther Med. 2017 Oct;34:46-56. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2017.07.010. Epub 2017 Jul 26.
Total glucosides of paeony (TGP) is commonly used to treat rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in China. However, clinical practice hasn't been well informed by evidence from appropriately conducted systematic reviews. This PRISMA-compliant systematic review aims at examining the effectiveness and safety of TGP for RA.
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing TGP with placebo, no treatment, or disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) for patients with RA were retrieved by searching seven databases. Primary outcomes included disease improvement and disease remission. Secondary outcomes included adverse effects, pain, health-related quality of life, C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). Data extraction and analyses were conducted according to the Cochrane standards. We assessed risk of bias for each included studies and quality of evidence on pre-specified outcomes.
Eight studies enrolling 1209 patients with active RA were included in this systematic review. On the basis of traditional DMARD(s), TGP might be beneficial for patients with RA in improvement of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 response rate, ACR 50 response rate, ACR70 response rate, and in reduction of adverse effects, compared with no treatment. The overall methodological quality of included studies and the quality of evidence for each outcome were limited.
Current trials suggested potential benefits of TGP for RA on the basis of traditional DMARD(s). Therefore, TGP may be a good choice for RA as an adjuvant therapy. However, considering the limited methodological quality and strength of evidence, high-quality RCTs are warranted to support the use of TGP for RA.
在中国,芍药总苷(TGP)常用于治疗类风湿关节炎(RA)。然而,临床实践尚未充分依据适当开展的系统评价证据。本项符合PRISMA标准的系统评价旨在考察TGP治疗RA的有效性和安全性。
通过检索七个数据库,获取比较TGP与安慰剂、不治疗或改善病情抗风湿药(DMARDs)用于RA患者的随机对照试验(RCTs)。主要结局包括疾病改善和疾病缓解。次要结局包括不良反应、疼痛、健康相关生活质量、C反应蛋白(CRP)和红细胞沉降率(ESR)。根据Cochrane标准进行数据提取和分析。我们评估了每项纳入研究的偏倚风险以及预设结局的证据质量。
本系统评价纳入了八项研究,共1209例活动期RA患者。在传统DMARDs基础上,与不治疗相比,TGP可能有利于RA患者提高美国风湿病学会(ACR)20缓解率、ACR 50缓解率、ACR70缓解率,并减少不良反应。纳入研究的总体方法学质量以及各结局的证据质量有限。
当前试验表明,在传统DMARDs基础上,TGP对RA可能有益。因此,TGP作为辅助治疗可能是RA的一个良好选择。然而,考虑到方法学质量和证据强度有限,需要高质量的RCTs来支持TGP用于RA的治疗。