Suppr超能文献

移植候选人的风险因素、钙评分、冠状动脉 CTA、心肌灌注成像和有创性冠状动脉造影的预后价值。

Prognostic Value of Risk Factors, Calcium Score, Coronary CTA, Myocardial Perfusion Imaging, and Invasive Coronary Angiography in Kidney Transplantation Candidates.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Cardiology, Hospital Unit West, Herning, Denmark.

Department of Nephrology, Division of Medicine, Akershus University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Jun;11(6):842-854. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.07.012. Epub 2017 Sep 13.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to perform a prospective head-to-head comparison of the predictive value of clinical risk factors and a variety of cardiac imaging modalities including coronary artery calcium score (CACS), coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA), single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), and invasive coronary angiography (ICA) on major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and all-cause mortality in kidney transplantation candidates.

BACKGROUND

Current guidelines recommend screening for coronary artery disease in kidney transplantation candidates. Furthermore, noninvasive stress imaging is recommended in current guidelines, despite its low diagnostic accuracy and uncertain prognostic value.

METHODS

The study prospectively evaluated 154 patients referred for kidney transplantation. All patients underwent CACS, coronary CTA, SPECT, and ICA testing. The clinical endpoints were extracted from patients' interviews, patients' records, and registries.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up time was 3.7 years. In total, 27 (17.5%) patients experienced MACE, and 31 (20.1%) patients died during follow-up. In a time-to-event analysis, both risk factors and CACS significantly predicted death, but only CACS predicted MACE. Combining risk factors with CACS identified a very-low-risk cohort with a MACE event rate of 2.1%, and a 1.0% mortality rate per year. Of the diagnostic modalities, coronary CTA and ICA significantly predicted MACE, but only coronary CTA predicted death. In contrast, SPECT predicted neither MACE nor death.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with traditional risk factors and other cardiac imaging modalities, CACS and coronary CTA seem superior for risk stratification in kidney transplant candidates. Applying a combination of risk factors and CACS and subsequently coronary CTA seems to be the most appropriate strategy. (Angiographic CT of Renal Transplantation Candidate Study [ACToR]; NCT01344434).

摘要

目的

本研究旨在前瞻性地比较临床危险因素和各种心脏成像方式(包括冠状动脉钙评分[CACS]、冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影[CTA]、单光子发射计算机断层扫描[SPECT]和有创冠状动脉造影[ICA])对主要不良心脏事件(MACE)和全因死亡率的预测价值,这些危险因素和成像方式都用于肾移植候选者。

背景

目前的指南建议对肾移植候选者进行冠状动脉疾病筛查。此外,尽管非侵入性应激成像的诊断准确性较低,预后价值不确定,但目前的指南仍建议使用该方法。

方法

该研究前瞻性评估了 154 名接受肾移植的患者。所有患者均接受 CACS、冠状动脉 CTA、SPECT 和 ICA 检查。临床终点从患者访谈、患者记录和登记处提取。

结果

平均随访时间为 3.7 年。共有 27 名(17.5%)患者发生 MACE,31 名(20.1%)患者在随访期间死亡。在时间事件分析中,危险因素和 CACS 均显著预测死亡,但只有 CACS 预测 MACE。将危险因素与 CACS 相结合,确定了一个低危队列,MACE 发生率为 2.1%,每年死亡率为 1.0%。在诊断方式中,冠状动脉 CTA 和 ICA 显著预测 MACE,但只有冠状动脉 CTA 预测死亡。相比之下,SPECT 既不能预测 MACE,也不能预测死亡。

结论

与传统危险因素和其他心脏成像方式相比,CACS 和冠状动脉 CTA 似乎更能对肾移植候选者进行风险分层。应用危险因素和 CACS 的组合,随后进行冠状动脉 CTA,似乎是最合适的策略。(肾移植候选者血管造影 CT 研究[ACToR];NCT01344434)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验