Department of Medicine, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Clinical and Experimental Endocrinology, UZ Gasthuisberg, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017 Nov;5(11):864-876. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30308-X. Epub 2017 Sep 14.
BACKGROUND: Dapagliflozin is a sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor approved for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of dapagliflozin as an add-on to adjustable insulin in patients with inadequately controlled type 1 diabetes. METHODS: DEPICT-1 was a double-blind, randomised, parallel-controlled, three-arm, phase 3, multicentre study done at 143 sites in 17 countries. Eligible patients were aged 18-75 years and had inadequately controlled type 1 diabetes (HbA between ≥7·7% and ≤11·0% [≥61·0 mmol/mol and ≤97·0 mmol/mol]) and had been prescribed insulin for at least 12 months before enrolment. After an 8 week lead-in period to optimise diabetes management, patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) using an interactive voice response system to dapagliflozin 5 mg or 10 mg once daily, given orally, or matched placebo. Randomisation was stratified by current use of continuous glucose monitoring, method of insulin administration, and baseline HbA. The primary efficacy outcome was the change from baseline in HbA after 24 weeks of treatment in the full analysis set, which consisted of all randomly assigned patients who received at least one dose of study drug. An additional 55 patients who were incorrectly and non-randomly allocated to only dapagliflozin treatment groups were included in the safety analysis set. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02268214; data collection for the present analysis was completed on Jan 4, 2017, and a 28 week extension phase is ongoing. FINDINGS: Between Nov 11, 2014, and April 16, 2016, 833 patients were assigned to treatment groups and included in safety analyses (dapagliflozin 5 mg [n=277] vs dapagliflozin 10 mg [n=296] vs placebo [n=260]; 778 of these patients were randomly assigned and included in the full analysis set for efficacy analyses (259 vs 259 vs 260; difference due to randomisation error affecting 55 patients). Mean baseline HbA was 8·53% (70 mmol/mol; SD 0·67% [7·3 mmol/mol]). At week 24, both doses of dapagliflozin significantly reduced HbA compared with placebo (mean difference from baseline to week 24 for dapagliflozin 5 mg vs placebo was -0·42% [95% CI -0·56 to -0·28; p<0·0001] and for dapagliflozin 10 mg vs placebo was -0·45% [-0·58 to -0·31; p<0·0001]). Among patients in the dapagliflozin 5 mg (n=277), dapagliflozin 10 mg (n=296), and placebo (n=260) groups, the most common adverse events were nasopharyngitis (38 [14%] vs 36 [12%] vs 39 [15%]), urinary tract infection (19 [7%] vs 11 [4%] vs 13 [5%]), upper respiratory tract infection (15 [5%] vs 15 [5%] vs 11 [4%]), and headache (12 [4%] vs 17 [6%] vs 11 [4%]). Hypoglycaemia occurred in 220 (79%), 235 (79%), and 207 (80%) patients in the dapagliflozin 5 mg, dapagliflozin 10 mg, and placebo groups, respectively; severe hypoglycaemia occurred in 21 (8%), 19 (6%), and 19 (7%) patients, respectively. Adjudicated definite diabetic ketoacidosis occurred in four (1%) patients in the dapagliflozin 5 mg group, five (2%) in the dapagliflozin 10 mg group, and three (1%) in the placebo group. INTERPRETATION: Our results suggest that dapagliflozin is a promising adjunct treatment to insulin to improve glycaemic control in patients with inadequately controlled type 1 diabetes. FUNDING: AstraZeneca and Bristol-Myers Squibb.
背景:达格列净是一种钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂,获批用于治疗 2 型糖尿病。我们旨在评估达格列净作为附加疗法用于治疗血糖控制不佳的 1 型糖尿病患者的疗效和安全性。
方法:DEPICT-1 是一项在 17 个国家的 143 个地点进行的双盲、随机、平行对照、三臂、3 期、多中心研究。符合条件的患者年龄为 18-75 岁,患有血糖控制不佳的 1 型糖尿病(HbA1c 在 7.7%-11.0%[61.0-97.0 mmol/mol]之间),且在入组前至少使用胰岛素治疗 12 个月。在进行 8 周的优化糖尿病管理导入期后,患者使用交互式语音应答系统以 1:1:1 的比例随机分配至达格列净 5 mg 或 10 mg 每日 1 次口服组,或匹配的安慰剂组。随机分组按当前使用连续血糖监测、胰岛素给药方式和基线 HbA1c 分层。主要疗效结局是在治疗 24 周时,与安慰剂组相比,HbA1c 的变化值,该值来自接受至少一剂研究药物的所有随机分配患者的完整分析集。另外有 55 名被错误和非随机分配至达格列净治疗组的患者被纳入安全性分析集。这项研究在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,编号为 NCT02268214;本分析的数据收集于 2017 年 1 月 4 日完成,目前正在进行 28 周的扩展阶段。
结果:2014 年 11 月 11 日至 2016 年 4 月 16 日,833 名患者被分配至治疗组并纳入安全性分析(达格列净 5 mg[277 名] vs 达格列净 10 mg[296 名] vs 安慰剂[260 名];778 名患者被随机分配并纳入疗效分析的完整分析集[259 名 vs 259 名 vs 260 名;由于随机分配错误影响了 55 名患者,因此存在差异]。平均基线 HbA1c 为 8.53%(70 mmol/mol;SD 0.67%[7.3 mmol/mol])。在第 24 周时,与安慰剂组相比,两种剂量的达格列净均显著降低 HbA1c(达格列净 5 mg 组从基线到第 24 周的平均差值为 -0.42%[95%CI -0.56 至 -0.28;p<0.0001],达格列净 10 mg 组为 -0.45%[-0.58 至 -0.31;p<0.0001])。在达格列净 5 mg(n=277)、达格列净 10 mg(n=296)和安慰剂(n=260)组中,最常见的不良事件是鼻咽炎(38[14%] vs 36[12%] vs 39[15%])、尿路感染(19[7%] vs 11[4%] vs 13[5%])、上呼吸道感染(15[5%] vs 15[5%] vs 11[4%])和头痛(12[4%] vs 17[6%] vs 11[4%])。达格列净 5 mg、达格列净 10 mg 和安慰剂组分别有 220(79%)、235(79%)和 207(80%)名患者发生低血糖,严重低血糖分别有 21(8%)、19(6%)和 19(7%)名患者发生,确诊的糖尿病酮症酸中毒分别有 4(1%)名、5(2%)名和 3(1%)名患者发生。
结论:我们的结果表明,达格列净是一种有前途的附加疗法,可改善血糖控制不佳的 1 型糖尿病患者的血糖控制。
经费来源:阿斯利康和百时美施贵宝。
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2016-9-16
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025-6-24
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2025-7
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2025-4-22