Pacitto A, Stabile L, Moreno T, Kumar P, Wierzbicka A, Morawska L, Buonanno G
Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, University of Cassino and Southern Lazio, Cassino, Italy.
Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, University of Cassino and Southern Lazio, Cassino, Italy.
Environ Pollut. 2018 Jan;232:113-122. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.09.023. Epub 2017 Sep 15.
In the present study, the daily dose in terms of particle surface area received by citizens living in five cities in Western countries, characterized by different lifestyle, culture, climate and built-up environment, was evaluated and compared. For this purpose, the exposure to sub-micron particle concentration levels of the population living in Barcelona (Spain), Cassino (Italy), Guilford (United Kingdom), Lund (Sweden), and Brisbane (Australia) was measured through a direct exposure assessment approach. In particular, measurements of the exposure at a personal scale were performed by volunteers (15 per each population) that used a personal particle counter for different days in order to obtain exposure data in microenvironments/activities they resided/performed. Non-smoking volunteers performing non-industrial jobs were considered in the study. Particle concentration data allowed obtaining the exposure of the population living in each city. Such data were combined in a Monte Carlo method with the time activity pattern data characteristics of each population and inhalation rate to obtain the most probable daily dose in term of particle surface area as a function of the population gender, age, and nationality. The highest daily dose was estimated for citizens living in Cassino and Guilford (>1000 mm), whereas the lowest value was recognized for Lund citizens (around 100 mm). Indoor air quality, and in particular cooking and eating activities, was recognized as the main influencing factor in terms of exposure (and thus dose) of the population: then confirming that lifestyle (e.g. time spent in cooking activities) strongly affect the daily dose of the population. On the contrary, a minor or negligible contribution of the outdoor microenvironments was documented.
在本研究中,对生活在西方国家五个城市、具有不同生活方式、文化、气候和建筑环境的居民所接受的以颗粒表面积计的每日剂量进行了评估和比较。为此,通过直接暴露评估方法测量了居住在巴塞罗那(西班牙)、卡西诺(意大利)、吉尔福德(英国)、隆德(瑞典)和布里斯班(澳大利亚)的人群对亚微米颗粒浓度水平的暴露情况。具体而言,由志愿者(每个城市15人)在个人层面进行暴露测量,这些志愿者在不同日子使用个人颗粒计数器,以便获取他们居住/进行活动的微环境中的暴露数据。研究中考虑的是从事非工业工作的不吸烟志愿者。颗粒浓度数据使得能够获取每个城市居民的暴露情况。这些数据通过蒙特卡洛方法与每个城市人群的时间活动模式数据特征以及吸入率相结合,以获得作为人群性别、年龄和国籍函数的最可能的以颗粒表面积计的每日剂量。卡西诺和吉尔福德的居民估计每日剂量最高(>1000平方毫米),而隆德居民的剂量值最低(约100平方毫米)。室内空气质量,特别是烹饪和饮食活动,被认为是人群暴露(进而剂量)的主要影响因素:这进而证实生活方式(例如在烹饪活动中花费的时间)强烈影响人群的每日剂量。相反,记录显示室外微环境的贡献较小或可忽略不计。