Huda A Q, Karim M R, Mahmud M A, Islam M S, Haque M F, Islam M R, Hossain M A
Dr AK Qumrul Huda, Associate Professor (ICU), Department Anaesthesia, Analgesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University (BSMMU), Shahbagh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Mymensingh Med J. 2017 Jul;26(3):585-591.
Critically ill patients of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) need highest level of monitoring, intense nursing care and integrated management which are very expensive and consume significant part of hospital resources. Prediction of outcome from disease has become an essential component of health science. So, various scoring systems have been developed to predict outcome of critically ill patients in ICU. There is no perfect model of severity score to predict ICU mortality. Search for new system is still remaining as continuous efforts to find the best model to get accurate information about the prognosis and outcome of critically ill patients. This observational prospective cohort study was carried out in ICU of Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University (BSMMU), Dhaka, Bangladesh from March 2015 to September 2015 to evaluate the ability of mortality prediction of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE)-II after adding RDW. Total 62 patients, clinically diagnosed as sepsis with positive culture were included in this study after analyzing selection criteria. APACHE II score model was compared with APACHE II plus RDW score model in relation to mortality outcome assessment. Sensitivity, Specificity, Positive predictive value (PPV), Negative predictive value (NPV) and Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve were used as parameter to compare the predictive ability of the two models. The derived model APACHE II- RDW was found with higher predictive power (Pearson's correlation coefficient - 0.915) than APACHE II (Pearson's correlation coefficient - 0.885) in relation to mortality (p<0.01). Accuracy was compared by using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve between the two models and AUROC was found higher (AUC-0.87) in case of new model compared with conventional model (AUC-0.85). So combination of RDW with APACHE-II increases the predictive ability of the scoring model in relation to mortality.
重症监护病房(ICU)的重症患者需要最高水平的监测、密集的护理和综合管理,这些成本高昂,消耗了医院资源的很大一部分。疾病预后预测已成为健康科学的重要组成部分。因此,已经开发了各种评分系统来预测ICU重症患者的预后。目前尚无完美的严重程度评分模型来预测ICU死亡率。寻找新系统的工作仍在持续进行,以努力找到最佳模型,从而获取有关重症患者预后和结局的准确信息。本观察性前瞻性队列研究于2015年3月至2015年9月在孟加拉国达卡的班加班杜·谢赫·穆吉布医科大学(BSMMU)的ICU进行,旨在评估在加入红细胞分布宽度(RDW)后急性生理与慢性健康状况评估系统(APACHE)-II对死亡率的预测能力。在分析入选标准后,本研究共纳入62例临床诊断为败血症且血培养阳性的患者。在死亡率结局评估方面,将APACHE II评分模型与APACHE II加RDW评分模型进行了比较。使用敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性预测值(NPV)和受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线作为参数来比较两种模型的预测能力。结果发现,与死亡率相关的衍生模型APACHE II-RDW的预测能力(皮尔逊相关系数-0.915)高于APACHE II(皮尔逊相关系数-0.885)(p<0.01)。通过ROC曲线比较了两种模型的准确性,发现新模型的曲线下面积(AUROC)更高(AUC-0.87),而传统模型的AUROC为0.85。因此,RDW与APACHE-II的结合提高了评分模型对死亡率的预测能力。