Department of Urology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel.
J Telemed Telecare. 2018 Oct;24(9):603-607. doi: 10.1177/1357633X17727773. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
Introduction Assessment of urothelial bladder cancer during cystoscopy or transurethral resection of bladder tumour has a significant impact on the urologist's decision-making: treatment with simple outpatient fulguration, required depth of resection, and need of immediate post-surgical intravesical therapy. These choices depend heavily on the urologist's ability to accurately assess pre-biopsy tumour stage and grade. The aim of the study was to determine whether evaluation of photographs taken during transurethral resection of bladder tumour can reliably characterize a tumour's stage and grade. Methods Smartphone photographs of 50 urothelial bladder cancer cases were taken at the beginning of transurethral resection of bladder tumour and individually presented to seven senior urologists. All urologists were blinded to the final pathological report and to any other urological evaluation. Each one was asked to rate the tumour as low vs high grade and noninvasive Ta vs noninvasive T1 or muscle invasive. Results were compared with final pathology. Individual appraisal and the majority's opinion were evaluated. Results Urologists have correctly predicted tumour stage and grade in 63.5% of cases (222 of 350, average of 32 out of 50 accurate assessments). The final majority assessment was correct in 40 of 50 cases (80%). Sensitivity and specificity of the final results for the diagnosis of T1 or higher were 80% and 88.6%, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity for Ta low grade were 83.3% and 80%, respectively. Conclusions To the best of our knowledge, this is the first documented attempt to evaluate urologists' ability to assess urothelial bladder cancer stage and grade using endoscopic photographs. Urologists can usually identify stage and grade of urothelial bladder cancer but accuracy increases when multiple senior urologists examine the same photographs and achieve majority consensus. Presenting photographs of urothelial bladder cancer to a team of urologists may lead to an excellent decision regarding type and extent of surgical treatment and substantiate appropriate post-surgical management.
介绍
治疗采用简单的门诊电灼术、所需的切除深度以及是否需要立即进行术后膀胱内治疗。这些选择在很大程度上取决于泌尿科医生准确评估活检前肿瘤分期和分级的能力。本研究旨在确定经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术期间拍摄的照片是否可以可靠地描述肿瘤的分期和分级。
方法
在经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术开始时,对 50 例尿路上皮膀胱癌病例拍摄了智能手机照片,并分别呈现给 7 位资深泌尿科医生。所有泌尿科医生均对最终病理报告和任何其他泌尿科评估一无所知。要求每位医生根据肿瘤分级和肿瘤是否为非浸润性 Ta 期或非浸润性 T1 期或肌肉浸润性,对肿瘤进行低级别与高级别和非侵袭性 Ta 期与非侵袭性 T1 期或肌肉浸润性的判断。将结果与最终病理进行比较,并评估个体评估和多数人的意见。
结果
泌尿科医生在 63.5%的病例(350 例中的 222 例,平均 50 例中有 32 例正确评估)中正确预测了肿瘤分期和分级。最终的多数评估在 50 例中有 40 例(80%)是正确的。最终结果对 T1 或更高分期的诊断的敏感性和特异性分别为 80%和 88.6%。Ta 低级别肿瘤的敏感性和特异性分别为 83.3%和 80%。
结论
据我们所知,这是首次尝试使用内窥镜照片评估泌尿科医生评估尿路上皮膀胱癌分期和分级的能力。泌尿科医生通常可以识别尿路上皮膀胱癌的分期和分级,但当多名资深泌尿科医生检查相同的照片并达成多数共识时,准确性会提高。向一组泌尿科医生展示尿路上皮膀胱癌的照片可能会导致对手术治疗类型和范围的出色决策,并证实适当的术后管理。