1Departments of Pediatrics and Critical Care, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. 2Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. 3Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, McMaster Children's Hospital, Hamilton, ON, Canada. 4Department of Critical Care, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada. 5King Fahd Armed Forces Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2017 Nov;18(11):e546-e554. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001329.
To determine the feasibility of conducting a full trial evaluating the efficacy of early mobilization using in-bed cycling as an adjunct to physiotherapy, on functional outcomes in critically ill children.
Single center, pilot, randomized controlled trial.
Twelve-bed tertiary care, medical-surgical PICU at McMaster Children's Hospital, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Children 3-17 years old who were limited to bed-rest with an expected PICU stay of at least 48 hours. Patients were excluded if they were at their baseline level of function, already mobilizing out of bed or expected to do so within 24 hours.
Patients were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to early mobilization using in-bed cycling in addition to usual care physiotherapy (cycling arm) or to usual care physiotherapy alone (control). Usual care was according to institutional practice guidelines. The primary outcome was feasibility and safety.
Thirty patients were enrolled (20 to the cycling and 10 to control) over a 12-month period, at a 93.7% consent rate. The median (interquartile range) time from PICU admission to mobilization was 1.5 days (1-3) in the cycling arm and 2.5 days (2-7) in the control arm. Total duration of mobilization therapy in PICU was 210 (152-380) and 136 minutes (42-314 min) in cycling and control arms, respectively. Total number of PICU days mobilized was 5.0 (3-6) with cycling and 2.5 (2-4.8) with usual care. No adverse events occurred in either arm. The main threat to feasibility of mobilization was the availability of physiotherapists or research personnel.
Early mobilization is safe and feasible in the PICU. In-bed cycling may facilitate greater duration and intensity of mobilization, in critically ill children. A full-scale randomized controlled trial is warranted to evaluate the efficacy of this intervention on PICU-acquired morbidities and functional outcomes in this population.
确定在-bed 循环作为物理治疗的辅助手段对危重症儿童进行早期运动的疗效进行全面试验的可行性。
单中心、试验性、随机对照试验。
加拿大安大略省汉密尔顿麦克马斯特儿童医院的 12 床三级护理、内科-外科 PICU。
年龄在 3-17 岁之间,因卧床休息限制活动,预计 PICU 住院时间至少为 48 小时。如果患者处于基线功能水平,已经下床活动或预计在 24 小时内下床活动,则将其排除在外。
患者按 2:1 的比例随机分为早期运动组(接受 in-bed 循环和常规护理物理治疗)和常规护理组(仅接受常规护理物理治疗)。常规护理根据机构实践指南进行。主要结局是可行性和安全性。
在 12 个月的时间内,共招募了 30 名患者(20 名进入循环组,10 名进入对照组),同意率为 93.7%。从 PICU 入院到开始运动的中位(四分位距)时间为 1.5 天(1-3)在循环组,在对照组为 2.5 天(2-7)。在 PICU 中进行的总运动治疗时间分别为 210(152-380)和 136 分钟(42-314 分钟)在循环组和对照组。进行运动治疗的 PICU 天数分别为 5.0(3-6)天和 2.5(2-4.8)天。在这两个组中,都没有发生不良事件。运动的主要可行性威胁是物理治疗师或研究人员的可用性。
在 PICU 中,早期运动是安全可行的。在-bed 循环可能有助于增加危重症儿童的运动时间和强度。需要进行全面的随机对照试验,以评估该干预措施对该人群 ICU 获得性发病率和功能结果的疗效。