O'Shea P M, Griffin T P, Browne G A, Gallagher N, Brady J J, Dennedy M C, Bell M, Wall D, Fitzgibbon M
Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Galway University Hospitals, Galway, Ireland.
Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Galway University Hospitals, Galway, Ireland.
Pract Lab Med. 2016 Nov 13;7:6-14. doi: 10.1016/j.plabm.2016.11.002. eCollection 2017 Apr.
The recommended approach to screening for primary aldosteronism (PA) in at-risk populations is to determine the ratio of aldosterone concentration (serum (SAC)/plasma (PAC)) to renin measured in plasma as activity (PRA) or concentration (DRC). However, lack of assay standardisation mandates the need for method-specific decision thresholds and clinical validation in the local population.
The study objective was to establish method-specific aldosterone: renin ratio (ARR) cut-offs for PA in men and women using the IDS-iSYS® assay system (IDS plc).
A prospective cohort study design was used. PAC and DRC were measured immunochemically in ethylenediamine-tetraacetic acid (EDTA) plasma on the IDS-iSYS® instrument.
A total of 437 subjects (218 men, 219 women) were recruited including: healthy normotensive volunteers (n=266) and women taking the oral contraceptive pill (OCP; n=15); patients with essential hypertension (EH; n=128); confirmed PA (n=16); adrenal cortical carcinoma (ACC; n=3); Addison's disease (AD; n=4) and phaeochromocytoma/paraganglioma (PPGL; n=5). In this population, an ARR cut-off at >37.4 pmol/mIU provided 100% diagnostic sensitivity, 96% specificity and positive likelihood ratio for PA of 23:1. When the ARR decision threshold was stratified according to gender, a cut-off of >26.1 pmol/mIU in men and >113.6 pmol/mIU in women resulted in diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of 100%.
This study demonstrates that decision thresholds for PA should not only be method-specific but also gender-specific. However, given the small number of PA patients (n=16), particularly women (n=4), further validation through a prospective study with a larger PA cohort is required before the thresholds presented here could be recommended for routine clinical use.
在高危人群中筛查原发性醛固酮增多症(PA)的推荐方法是测定醛固酮浓度(血清(SAC)/血浆(PAC))与血浆中测量的肾素活性(PRA)或浓度(DRC)的比值。然而,缺乏检测标准化要求在当地人群中制定特定方法的决策阈值并进行临床验证。
本研究的目的是使用IDS-iSYS®检测系统(IDS plc)确定男性和女性PA的特定方法醛固酮:肾素比值(ARR)临界值。
采用前瞻性队列研究设计。在IDS-iSYS®仪器上,用免疫化学法测定乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)血浆中的PAC和DRC。
共招募了437名受试者(218名男性,219名女性),包括:健康血压正常志愿者(n = 266)和服用口服避孕药(OCP;n = 15)的女性;原发性高血压(EH;n = 128)患者;确诊的PA(n = 16);肾上腺皮质癌(ACC;n = 3);艾迪生病(AD;n = 4)和嗜铬细胞瘤/副神经节瘤(PPGL;n = 5)。在该人群中,ARR临界值>37.4 pmol/mIU时,PA的诊断敏感性为100%,特异性为96%,阳性似然比为23:1。当根据性别对ARR决策阈值进行分层时,男性临界值>26.1 pmol/mIU,女性临界值>113.6 pmol/mIU,诊断敏感性和特异性均为100%。
本研究表明,PA的决策阈值不仅应是特定方法的,还应是特定性别的。然而,鉴于PA患者数量较少(n = 16),尤其是女性患者(n = 4),在本研究提出的阈值可推荐用于常规临床使用之前,需要通过更大规模PA队列的前瞻性研究进行进一步验证。