Suppr超能文献

沙利度胺和来那度胺用于复发性卵巢癌:文献系统综述

Thalidomide and lenalidomide for recurrent ovarian cancer: A systematic review of the literature.

作者信息

Tempfer Clemens B, Schultheis Beate, Hilal Ziad, Dogan Askin, Rezniczek Günther A

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Marien Hospital Herne, Ruhr University Bochum, D-44625 Herne, Germany.

Department of Hematology and Oncology, Marien Hospital Herne, Ruhr University Bochum, D-44625 Herne, Germany.

出版信息

Oncol Lett. 2017 Sep;14(3):3327-3336. doi: 10.3892/ol.2017.6578. Epub 2017 Jul 15.

Abstract

The present review aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of thalidomide and lenalidomide, two immunomodulatory drugs with anti-angiogenic properties, in women with recurrent ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer. A systematic review of the literature was conducted whereby Medline and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched using terms associated with thalidomide, lenalidomide, and recurrent ovarian, fallopian tube and primary peritoneal cancer. Published English language case reports, trials and studies that described the safety and efficacy of thalidomide or lenalidomide alone, or in combination with other drugs were reviewed. A total of 16 clinical studies involving 394 patients treated with thalidomide (n=188), lenalidomide (n=77) and 129 controls were identified, including five case reports (n=6), three case series (n=45), two phase I trials (n=27), four phase II trials (n=109), and two randomized phase III trials (n=207). In a pooled analysis of thalidomide investigated as a single drug, the overall clinical benefit rate was 43% (43/99) with a mean time to progression of 5.6 months. The response rate (complete response + partial response) was 25%. In a phase III trial, the combination of thalidomide and topotecan significantly increased the overall response rate compared with topotecan alone [14/30 (47%) vs. 8/39 (21%)]. In another phase III trial involving women with asymptomatic biochemical recurrence, compared with tamoxifen, thalidomide was not more effective. Lenalidomide was investigated in three phase I trials and in one phase II trial with an overall clinical benefit rate of 52% (34/65), and a mean time to progression of 4.6 months. The response rate (complete response + partial response) was 6%. Systemic toxicity of both drugs was noted in >77% of patients with pneumonitis/pneumonia, fatigue, neuropathy and venous thromboembolism reported as the most common side effects. Thalidomide and lenalidomide are moderately active in recurrent ovarian cancer. Thalidomide possesses synergistic effects with topotecan. The toxicity of both drugs is considerable and there is a greater amount of data available for thalidomide compared to lenalidomide.

摘要

本综述旨在评估沙利度胺和来那度胺这两种具有抗血管生成特性的免疫调节药物,在复发性卵巢癌、输卵管癌和原发性腹膜癌女性患者中的安全性和有效性。我们对文献进行了系统回顾,通过使用与沙利度胺、来那度胺以及复发性卵巢癌、输卵管癌和原发性腹膜癌相关的术语,检索了Medline和Cochrane对照试验中央注册库。对已发表的英文病例报告、试验和研究进行了综述,这些报告描述了单独使用沙利度胺或来那度胺,或与其他药物联合使用时的安全性和有效性。共确定了16项临床研究,涉及394例接受沙利度胺治疗的患者(n = 188)、来那度胺治疗的患者(n = 77)以及129例对照,包括5例病例报告(n = 6)、3个病例系列(n = 45)、2项I期试验(n = 27)、4项II期试验(n = 109)和2项随机III期试验(n = 207)。在对作为单一药物研究的沙利度胺进行的汇总分析中,总体临床获益率为43%(43/99),平均疾病进展时间为5.6个月。缓解率(完全缓解 + 部分缓解)为25%。在一项III期试验中,与单独使用拓扑替康相比,沙利度胺与拓扑替康联合使用显著提高了总体缓解率[14/30(47%)对8/39(21%)]。在另一项涉及无症状生化复发女性患者的III期试验中与他莫昔芬相比,沙利度胺的效果并不更好。来那度胺在3项I期试验和1项II期试验中进行了研究总体临床获益率为52%(34/65),平均疾病进展时间为4.6个月。缓解率(完全缓解 + 部分缓解)为6%。超过77%的患者出现了这两种药物的全身毒性,肺炎/肺部炎症、疲劳、神经病变和静脉血栓栓塞被报告为最常见的副作用。沙利度胺和来那度胺在复发性卵巢癌中具有中等活性。沙利度胺与拓扑替康具有协同作用。两种药物的毒性都相当大,与来那度胺相比,沙利度胺有更多的数据可用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/528b/5587990/c4b350271daa/ol-14-03-3327-g00.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验