Department of Microbiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Graduate School of Biological Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
mBio. 2017 Sep 19;8(5):e01463-17. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01463-17.
The immunogenicity of current influenza virus vaccines is assessed by measuring an increase of influenza virus-specific antibodies in a hemagglutination inhibition assay. This method exclusively measures antibodies against the hemagglutinin head domain. While this domain is immunodominant, it has been shown that hemagglutination inhibition titers do not always accurately predict protection from disease. In addition, several novel influenza virus vaccines that are currently under development do not target the hemagglutinin head domain, but rather more conserved sites, including the hemagglutinin stalk. Importantly, antibodies against the hemagglutinin stalk do not show activity in hemagglutination inhibition assays and will require different methods for quantification. In this study, we tested human serum samples from a seasonal influenza virus vaccination trial and an avian H5N1 virus vaccination trial for antibody activities in multiple types of assays, including binding assays and also functional assays. We then performed serum transfer experiments in mice which then received an H1N1 virus challenge to assess the protective effects of the antibodies. We found that hemagglutinin-specific antibody levels measured in an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) correlated well with protection from weight loss in mice. In addition, we found that weight loss was also inversely correlated with the level of serum antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) as measured in a reporter assay. These findings indicate that protection is in part conferred by Fc-dependent mechanisms. In conclusion, ELISAs can be used to measure hemagglutinin-specific antibody levels that could serve as a surrogate marker of protection for universal influenza virus vaccines. Influenza viruses are a serious concern for public health and cause a large number of deaths worldwide every year. Current influenza virus vaccines can confer protection from disease, but they often show low efficacy due to the ever-changing nature of the viruses. Novel vaccination approaches target conserved epitopes of the virus, including the hemagglutinin stalk domain, to elicit universally protective antibodies that also bind to mutated viruses or new subtypes of viruses. Importantly, the hemagglutination inhibition assay-the only assay that has been accepted as a correlate of protection by regulatory authorities-cannot measure antibodies against the hemagglutinin stalk domain. Therefore, novel correlates of protection and assays to measure vaccine immunogenicity need to be developed. In this study, we correlated the results from multiple assays with protection in mice after transfer of human serum and a lethal virus challenge to investigate potential novel serological surrogate markers for protection.
目前,通过测量血凝抑制试验中流感病毒特异性抗体的增加来评估流感病毒疫苗的免疫原性。该方法专门测量针对血凝素头部结构域的抗体。虽然该结构域是免疫优势的,但已经表明血凝抑制滴度并不总是准确预测对疾病的保护。此外,目前正在开发的几种新型流感病毒疫苗并不针对血凝素头部结构域,而是针对更保守的位点,包括血凝素茎。重要的是,针对血凝素茎的抗体在血凝抑制试验中没有活性,需要使用不同的方法进行定量。在这项研究中,我们测试了季节性流感病毒疫苗接种试验和禽流感 H5N1 病毒疫苗接种试验的人类血清样本,以评估多种类型的检测方法中的抗体活性,包括结合测定法和功能测定法。然后,我们在接受 H1N1 病毒攻击的小鼠中进行血清转移实验,以评估抗体的保护作用。我们发现,酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)中测量的血凝素特异性抗体水平与小鼠体重减轻的保护作用密切相关。此外,我们发现体重减轻也与报告测定法中测量的血清抗体依赖性细胞毒性(ADCC)水平呈反比。这些发现表明保护部分是由 Fc 依赖性机制介导的。总之,ELISA 可用于测量血凝素特异性抗体水平,可作为通用流感病毒疫苗保护的替代标志物。流感病毒对公共卫生构成严重威胁,每年在全球造成大量死亡。目前的流感病毒疫苗可以提供疾病保护,但由于病毒的不断变化,它们的功效往往较低。新型疫苗接种方法针对病毒的保守表位,包括血凝素茎结构域,以引发普遍保护性抗体,这些抗体也能与突变病毒或新的病毒亚型结合。重要的是,血凝抑制试验 - 唯一被监管机构接受为保护相关性的试验 - 不能测量针对血凝素茎结构域的抗体。因此,需要开发新的保护相关性和测量疫苗免疫原性的检测方法。在这项研究中,我们将多种检测方法的结果与人类血清转移和致命病毒攻击后小鼠的保护作用相关联,以研究潜在的新型血清学替代保护标志物。