• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探讨接受新辅助化疗的宫颈鳞癌患者行放疗与手术治疗的疗效。

Radiation therapy versus surgery for patients with cervical squamous cell carcinoma who have undergone neoadjuvant chemotherapy revisited.

机构信息

Division of Gynecologic Oncology, National Hospital Organization, Hokkaido Cancer Center, 4-2 Kikusui, Shiroishi-ku, Sapporo, 003-0804, Japan.

出版信息

Int J Clin Oncol. 2018 Feb;23(1):126-133. doi: 10.1007/s10147-017-1191-1. Epub 2017 Sep 19.

DOI:10.1007/s10147-017-1191-1
PMID:28929314
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The therapeutic significance of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by radiation therapy (RT) was negated during the early 1990s. Here, we compared post-NAC RT to surgery for chemo-sensitive cervical squamous cell carcinoma (SCC).

METHODS

This study included 79 consecutive patients with cervical SCC who were treated by NAC followed by surgery (n = 49) or by definitive RT (n = 30). We compared characteristics and survival outcomes between the surgery and RT groups by their responses to NAC.

RESULTS

Of the 79 patients, 70 (89%) had stage II-IV disease and 41 (52%) had radiological pelvic lymph node enlargement. The 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) rate of the entire cohort was 66.4% (median follow-up 54 months). Fifty-five patients (70%) achieved sufficient (complete or partial) responses to NAC. Among patients with insufficient NAC responses, the 5-year DSS rate of the surgery group (55.6%) was significantly higher than the RT group (20.0%; P = 0.044). However, among patients with sufficient responses to NAC, 5-year DSS rates did not significantly differ between the surgery and RT groups (82.3 vs 78.6%; P = 0.79) even though the RT group had many more unfavorable prognostic factors and received fewer subsequent treatments than the surgery group.

CONCLUSIONS

Post-NAC survival outcomes among patients with chemo-sensitive cervical SCC who then underwent RT were not inferior to those treated with surgery, and NAC did not detract from the efficacy of subsequent RT. Among selected patients who respond favorably to NAC, RT could be a less invasive substitute for surgery without compromising treatment outcomes.

摘要

背景

新辅助化疗(NAC)加放疗(RT)的治疗意义在 20 世纪 90 年代初被否定。在此,我们比较了新辅助化疗后加 RT 与手术治疗化疗敏感型宫颈鳞癌(SCC)的效果。

方法

本研究纳入了 79 例接受 NAC 治疗后行手术(n=49)或根治性 RT(n=30)的宫颈 SCC 患者。我们根据 NAC 反应比较了手术组和 RT 组的特征和生存结局。

结果

79 例患者中,70 例(89%)为 II-IV 期,41 例(52%)有影像学盆腔淋巴结肿大。全组 5 年疾病特异性生存率(DSS)为 66.4%(中位随访 54 个月)。70 例(70%)患者对 NAC 有足够(完全或部分)反应。在 NAC 反应不足的患者中,手术组的 5 年 DSS 率(55.6%)明显高于 RT 组(20.0%;P=0.044)。然而,在对 NAC 有足够反应的患者中,手术组和 RT 组的 5 年 DSS 率无显著差异(82.3% vs 78.6%;P=0.79),尽管 RT 组有更多的不利预后因素,且接受的后续治疗少于手术组。

结论

对化疗敏感的宫颈 SCC 患者行 NAC 后行 RT 的生存结局不劣于手术治疗,且 NAC 并未降低后续 RT 的疗效。在对 NAC 反应良好的患者中,RT 可作为手术的一种侵袭性较小的替代方法,而不影响治疗结局。

相似文献

1
Radiation therapy versus surgery for patients with cervical squamous cell carcinoma who have undergone neoadjuvant chemotherapy revisited.探讨接受新辅助化疗的宫颈鳞癌患者行放疗与手术治疗的疗效。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2018 Feb;23(1):126-133. doi: 10.1007/s10147-017-1191-1. Epub 2017 Sep 19.
2
Efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus radical surgery in patients with bulky stage II cervical squamous cell carcinoma: A retrospective cohort study.新辅助化疗联合根治性手术治疗巨块型 IIB 期宫颈鳞癌的疗效:一项回顾性队列研究。
Int J Surg. 2016 Jun;30:121-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.04.038. Epub 2016 Apr 27.
3
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in stage IB2 squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix.IB2期宫颈鳞状细胞癌的新辅助化疗
Gynecol Oncol. 1997 May;65(2):348-56. doi: 10.1006/gyno.1997.4645.
4
Explanation for the failure of neoadjuvant chemotherapy to improve outcomes after radiotherapy for locally advanced uterine cervical cancer from the standpoint of the tumor regression rate.从肿瘤退缩率角度解释新辅助化疗未能改善局部晚期子宫颈癌放疗后结局的原因。
Radiat Med. 2007 Feb;25(2):53-9. doi: 10.1007/s11604-006-0101-7. Epub 2007 Feb 27.
5
Radiotherapy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy for cervical carcinoma. A randomized multicenter study of sequential cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil and radiotherapy in advanced cervical carcinoma stage 3B and 4A.宫颈癌的放疗与新辅助化疗。一项关于晚期3B期和4A期宫颈癌顺铂与5-氟尿嘧啶序贯治疗及放疗的随机多中心研究。
Cancer. 1996 Jun 1;77(11):2371-8. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19960601)77:11<2371::AID-CNCR28>3.0.CO;2-T.
6
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical surgery and radiotherapy vs. pelvic irradiation in patients with cervical cancer FIGO stage IIB - IVA.FIGO IIB-IVA期宫颈癌患者新辅助化疗后行根治性手术及放疗与盆腔放疗的对比研究
J BUON. 2006 Jul-Sep;11(3):291-7.
7
Radical surgery after neoadjuvant intra-arterial chemotherapy in stage IIIb squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix.Ⅲb期宫颈鳞状细胞癌新辅助动脉内化疗后的根治性手术。
Int Surg. 1999 Jan-Mar;84(1):67-73.
8
Neoadjuvant intraarterial chemotherapy followed by radical hysterectomy and/or radiotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer.新辅助动脉内化疗后行根治性子宫切除术和/或放疗治疗局部晚期宫颈癌。
Gynecol Oncol. 1998 May;69(2):130-6. doi: 10.1006/gyno.1998.4976.
9
[Evaluation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancinoma].[局部晚期宫颈癌新辅助化疗的评估]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2006 Feb;41(2):95-8.
10
Chemotherapy with cisplatin and paclitaxel in locally advanced cervical cancer: has this regimen still a role as neoadjuvant setting?顺铂和紫杉醇化疗用于局部晚期宫颈癌:该方案在新辅助治疗中仍有作用吗?
Minerva Ginecol. 2012 Apr;64(2):95-107.

引用本文的文献

1
Outcome evaluation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage IB2 or IIA cervical cancer: a retrospective comparative study.IB2期或IIA期宫颈癌患者新辅助化疗的疗效评估:一项回顾性比较研究
Transl Cancer Res. 2020 Mar;9(3):1894-1902. doi: 10.21037/tcr.2020.02.27.
2
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy does not improve the prognosis and lymph node metastasis rate of locally advanced cervical squamous cell carcinoma: A retrospective cohort study in China.新辅助化疗不能改善局部晚期宫颈鳞状细胞癌的预后及淋巴结转移率:一项中国的回顾性队列研究
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Sep;98(39):e17234. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000017234.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Chemoradiation in Cervical Carcinoma: A Review.宫颈癌新辅助化疗后同步放化疗:综述
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2016 May;26(4):729-36. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000663.
2
A phase II study of weekly neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical chemoradiation for locally advanced cervical cancer.一项针对局部晚期宫颈癌的每周新辅助化疗后行根治性放化疗的 II 期研究。
Br J Cancer. 2013 Jun 25;108(12):2464-9. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.230. Epub 2013 May 21.
3
Randomized clinical trial of weekly vs. triweekly cisplatin-based chemotherapy concurrent with radiotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer.
The protective role of DMBT1 in cervical squamous cell carcinoma.
DMBT1 在宫颈鳞癌中的保护作用。
Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2019 Dec;35(12):739-749. doi: 10.1002/kjm2.12117. Epub 2019 Aug 9.
随机临床试验:每周与每三周顺铂为基础的化疗联合放疗治疗局部晚期宫颈癌的比较。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Nov 15;81(4):e577-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.05.002. Epub 2011 Aug 11.
4
Phase III, open-label, randomized study comparing concurrent gemcitabine plus cisplatin and radiation followed by adjuvant gemcitabine and cisplatin versus concurrent cisplatin and radiation in patients with stage IIB to IVA carcinoma of the cervix.III 期、开放性、随机研究比较了同期吉西他滨联合顺铂和放疗后辅助吉西他滨和顺铂与同期顺铂和放疗在 IIB 期至 IVA 期宫颈癌患者中的疗效。
J Clin Oncol. 2011 May 1;29(13):1678-85. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.25.9663. Epub 2011 Mar 28.
5
Reducing uncertainties about the effects of chemoradiotherapy for cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data from 18 randomized trials.减少宫颈癌放化疗效果的不确定性:对18项随机试验的个体患者数据进行系统评价和Meta分析
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Dec 10;26(35):5802-12. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.16.4368. Epub 2008 Nov 10.
6
Long-term survival after concomitant chemoradiotherapy prior to surgery in advanced cervical carcinoma.晚期宫颈癌术前同步放化疗后的长期生存情况。
Gynecol Oncol. 2006 Feb;100(2):338-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.08.047. Epub 2005 Oct 5.
7
Results of hysterectomy in patients with bulky residual disease at the end of chemoradiotherapy for stage IB2/II cervical carcinoma.IB2/II期宫颈癌同步放化疗结束时存在大量残留病灶患者的子宫切除术结果
Ann Surg Oncol. 2005 Apr;12(4):332-7. doi: 10.1245/ASO.2005.05.020. Epub 2005 Mar 14.
8
Pelvic irradiation with concurrent chemotherapy versus pelvic and para-aortic irradiation for high-risk cervical cancer: an update of radiation therapy oncology group trial (RTOG) 90-01.同步化疗盆腔放疗与盆腔及腹主动脉旁放疗治疗高危宫颈癌的比较:放射肿瘤学组试验(RTOG)90-01的最新进展
J Clin Oncol. 2004 Mar 1;22(5):872-80. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.07.197.
9
A randomized trial comparing platinum-based chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy vs. radiotherapy alone in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer.一项针对局部晚期宫颈癌患者的随机试验,比较铂类化疗后放疗与单纯放疗的效果。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 1992 Sep;2(5):244-251. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1438.1992.02050244.x.
10
Randomized comparison of fluorouracil plus cisplatin versus hydroxyurea as an adjunct to radiation therapy in stage IIB-IVA carcinoma of the cervix with negative para-aortic lymph nodes: a Gynecologic Oncology Group and Southwest Oncology Group study.氟尿嘧啶联合顺铂与羟基脲作为主动脉旁淋巴结阴性的IIB-IVA期宫颈癌放疗辅助治疗的随机对照研究:一项妇科肿瘤学组和西南肿瘤学组的研究
J Clin Oncol. 1999 May;17(5):1339-48. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.5.1339.