Suppr超能文献

内镜颅底外科中动脉损伤的处理:病例系列及文献复习。

Managing Arterial Injury in Endoscopic Skull Base Surgery: Case Series and Review of the Literature.

机构信息

Department of Neurological Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York.

Department of Neurosurgery and Skull Base Surgery, Hospital Ernesto Dornelles, Porto Alegre, Brazil.

出版信息

Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2017 Feb 1;13(1):138-149. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000001180.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The most feared complications following endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery are arterial vascular injuries. Previously published literature is restricted to internal carotid artery injuries. The ideal method for controlling arterial bleeding during this kind of procedure is debated, and a variety of techniques have been advocated.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the management and outcome following intraoperative arterial injury during endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of a prospectively acquired database of consecutive endonasal endoscopic surgeries at the New York-Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical Center from December 2003 to June 2015 and identified all cases of arterial injury.

RESULTS

Of 800 cases, there were 4 arterial injuries (0.5%), of which only one involved the internal carotid artery (ICA), for a risk of 0.125%. The other 3 involved the ophthalmic artery, anterior communicating artery, and A1 segment of the anterior cerebral artery. In all cases, definitive treatment involved occlusion of the artery either through endovascular means (3 cases) or direct surgical ligation (1 case). Neurological examinations were unchanged after arterial repair with only 1 small asymptomatic stroke. Literature review identified 7336 patients, of which there were 25 arterial injuries, of which 19 were of the ICA. Hence, the total rate of arterial injury was 0.34% and the rate of ICA injury was 0.26%. Arterial sacrifice was the only reliable method for managing arterial injury.

CONCLUSION

Arterial injury is an uncommon event after endoscopic endonasal surgery. Attempts at arterial repair are rarely successful, and vessel sacrifice is the most reliable technique at this point.

摘要

背景

经鼻内镜颅底手术最令人恐惧的并发症是动脉血管损伤。以前发表的文献仅限于颈内动脉损伤。目前,对于控制这类手术中动脉出血的理想方法存在争议,各种技术都有被提倡。

目的

评估经鼻内镜颅底手术中发生动脉损伤时的处理方法和结果。

方法

我们对 2003 年 12 月至 2015 年 6 月期间在纽约长老会医院/威尔康奈尔医学中心连续进行的鼻内镜手术前瞻性数据库进行了回顾性分析,并确定了所有动脉损伤的病例。

结果

在 800 例患者中,有 4 例(0.5%)发生了动脉损伤,其中只有 1 例涉及颈内动脉(ICA),风险为 0.125%。另外 3 例涉及眼动脉、前交通动脉和大脑前动脉 A1 段。在所有病例中,通过血管内方法(3 例)或直接手术结扎(1 例)来确定治疗方案,对动脉进行了闭塞。动脉修复后,只有 1 例小无症状性中风,神经检查无变化。文献回顾共纳入 7336 例患者,其中 25 例发生动脉损伤,其中 19 例为颈内动脉损伤。因此,动脉损伤的总发生率为 0.34%,颈内动脉损伤的发生率为 0.26%。动脉牺牲是处理动脉损伤的唯一可靠方法。

结论

经鼻内镜手术后动脉损伤是一种罕见的事件。尝试动脉修复很少成功,在这一点上,血管牺牲是最可靠的技术。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验