Dygrýnová M, Uvízl M, Gallo J
Ortopedická klinika Lékařské fakulty Univerzity Palackého v Olomouci, Fakultní nemocnice Olomouc.
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2017;84(4):279-284.
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY Hallux rigidus is common and degenerative arthritis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint. The aim of this study was to assess the results of cheilectomy and total joint replacement (TJR) in patients with hallux rigidus. Minimum duration of followup was 18 months. MATERIAL AND METHODS The study included fifty-nine patients who underwent surgery at our Department due to hallux rigidus between January 2013 and December 2014. Thirty-seven patients underwent cheilectomy and twenty-two patients had total joint arthroplasty using METIS®. The outcomes were assessed by comparing preoperative and postoperative ranges of motion, VAS (Visual Analogue Scale), AOFAS-HMI (American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Hallux Metatarsophalangeal Interphalangeal) and patients' satisfaction with operative treatment. Preoperative and postoperative outcomes were compared for the individual types of surgery using the repeated measures ANOVA. The level of statistical significance was set at p < 0.01. RESULTS The mean age was 47.9 ± 7.0 years in patients who underwent cheilectomy and 62.5 ± 5.5 years in patients after TJR METIS®. There was a significant decrease (p < 0.001) in the VAS pain score and a significant improvement in dorsiflexion, range of movements, AOFAS-HMI scores in both the treatment groups. In both the groups more than 75% of patients reported good or excellent subjective results. DISCUSSION Our results are in agreement with findings of other studies assessing the results of cheilectomy and TJR surgery in patients with hallux rigidus. Direct comparison of the VAS pain score, AOFAS-HMI and ranges of motion across studies is difficult because of variability in the evaluation systems. Cheilectomy is mostly recommended for young active patients with mild osteoarthritis. Moreover, it is also possible to use minimally invasive surgery with early and reliable outcomes. At our Department, we perform cheilectomy also in younger patients with moderate osteoarthritis in order to extend the period of clinically acceptable results and thereby to postpone the TJR indication. TJR (similarly to arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint) is a procedure performed in elderly patients with low physical activity and more advanced deformities. CONCLUSIONS Both the reported methods offer reliable and valuable short-term clinical outcomes with relatively low complication rate. Cheilectomy is undoubtedly more appropriate for younger patients with mild or moderate arthritic changes. Although it does not appear to alter the natural progression of the disease process, it provides satisfactory pain relief, motion improvement and overall patient gait comfort for patients in a short-term period. TJR seems to be a better solution for less active older patients to whom it provides a loadable, painless, and moving joint. Key words: hallux rigidus, first metatarsophalangeal joint, cheilectomy, arthroplasty, Metis®, surgical treatment.
研究目的
僵硬性拇趾是常见的第一跖趾关节退行性关节炎。本研究的目的是评估僵硬性拇趾患者行关节切除术和全关节置换术(TJR)的效果。最短随访时间为18个月。
材料与方法
本研究纳入了2013年1月至2014年12月期间因僵硬性拇趾在我科接受手术的59例患者。37例行关节切除术,22例使用METIS®进行全关节置换术。通过比较术前和术后的活动范围、视觉模拟评分(VAS)、美国足踝外科协会拇趾跖趾间关节评分(AOFAS-HMI)以及患者对手术治疗的满意度来评估结果。使用重复测量方差分析比较个体手术类型的术前和术后结果。设定统计学显著性水平为p < 0.01。
结果
行关节切除术患者的平均年龄为47.9 ± 7.0岁,TJR METIS®术后患者的平均年龄为62.5 ± 5.5岁。两个治疗组的VAS疼痛评分均显著降低(p < 0.001),背屈、活动范围、AOFAS-HMI评分均显著改善。两组中超过75%的患者报告主观结果良好或优秀。
讨论
我们的结果与其他评估僵硬性拇趾患者关节切除术和TJR手术效果的研究结果一致。由于评估系统的差异,很难直接比较不同研究中的VAS疼痛评分、AOFAS-HMI和活动范围。关节切除术大多推荐用于轻度骨关节炎的年轻活跃患者。此外,也可以使用微创手术,其结果早期可靠。在我科,我们也对中度骨关节炎的年轻患者进行关节切除术,以延长临床可接受结果的时间,从而推迟TJR的适应证。TJR(类似于第一跖趾关节融合术)是针对身体活动较少且畸形更严重的老年患者进行的手术。
结论
所报道的两种方法均提供了可靠且有价值的短期临床结果,并发症发生率相对较低。关节切除术无疑更适合轻度或中度关节炎改变的年轻患者。虽然它似乎不会改变疾病进程的自然进展,但它能在短期内为患者提供满意的疼痛缓解、活动改善和整体步态舒适度。TJR似乎是不太活跃的老年患者的更好解决方案,可为他们提供可负重、无痛且可活动的关节。
僵硬性拇趾;第一跖趾关节;关节切除术;关节成形术;Metis®;手术治疗