Learmonth Mark
Durham University Business School, Durham University , Durham, UK.
J Health Organ Manag. 2017 Aug 21;31(5):542-555. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-11-2016-0213.
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to explore a possible discursive history of National Health Service (NHS) "management" (with management, for reasons that will become evident, very much in scare quotes). Such a history is offered as a complement, as well as a counterpoint, to the more traditional approaches that have already been taken to the history of the issue. Design/methodology/approach Document analysis and interviews with UK NHS trust chief executives. Findings After explicating the assumptions of the method it suggests, through a range of empirical sources that the NHS has undergone an era of administration, an era of management and an era of leadership. Research limitations/implications The paper enables a recasting of the history of the NHS; in particular, the potential for such a discursive history to highlight the interests supported and denied by different representational practices. Practical implications Today's so-called leaders are leaders because of conventional representational practices - not because of some essence about what they really are. Social implications New ideas about the nature of management. Originality/value The value of thinking in terms of what language does - rather than what it might represent.
目的 本文旨在探寻英国国民医疗服务体系(NHS)“管理”(出于后文将明晰的原因,“管理”一词多处使用了引号)可能存在的话语史。这样一部历史既作为对该问题传统研究方法的补充,也作为其对照。设计/方法/途径 文献分析以及对英国国民医疗服务体系信托机构首席执行官的访谈。发现 通过一系列实证资料,在阐释所采用方法的假设后表明,国民医疗服务体系经历了行政时代、管理时代和领导时代。研究局限/影响 本文有助于重塑国民医疗服务体系的历史;尤其是,这种话语史有潜力凸显不同代表性实践所支持和否定的利益。实际影响 当今所谓的领导者成为领导者是因为传统的代表性实践——而非因其本质特征。社会影响 关于管理本质的新观念。原创性/价值 从语言的作用而非其可能代表的内容进行思考的价值。