Suppr超能文献

高流量鼻导管治疗在儿科重症监护病房中的结局的预测因素:SpO/FiO 比值有用吗?

Predictive factors for the outcome of high flow nasal cannula therapy in a pediatric intensive care unit: Is the SpO/FiO ratio useful?

机构信息

Tepecik Teaching and Research Hospital, Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Izmir, Turkey.

Izmir Katip Celebi University, Medical School, Izmir, Turkey.

出版信息

J Crit Care. 2018 Apr;44:436-444. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.09.003. Epub 2017 Sep 6.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine the predictive factors for the outcome of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy in a pediatric intensive care unit (PICU).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We prospectively included all patients with acute respiratory distress/failure aged 1month to 18years who were admitted to the PICU between January 2015 and May 2016 and treated with HFNC as a primary support and for postextubation according to our pre-established protocol. HFNC failure was defined as the need for escalation to non-invasive ventilation (NIV) or invasive mechanical ventilation (MV). HFNC responders and nonresponders were compared based on clinical data obtained just before HFNC and at 30, 60, and 120min, 12, 24, and 48h, and at the end of therapy.

RESULTS

A total of 204 patients (median age: 16.5months) participated in the study. Twenty-six (12.7%) patients required escalation (4 to NIV and 22 to MV). Age >120months, higher PRISM-III and respiratory scores, and a lower SpO/FiO (S/F) ratio at admission were predictors of HFNC failure. Achievement of the S/F>200 goal at 60min significantly predicted successful HFNC.

CONCLUSION

Monitoring the S/F ratio might be useful and practical to avoid delaying escalation to another ventilation support. Failure to achieve S/F>200 at 60min should be a warning for the escalation of respiratory support.

摘要

目的

确定儿科重症监护病房(PICU)中高流量鼻导管(HFNC)治疗结局的预测因素。

材料和方法

我们前瞻性纳入了 2015 年 1 月至 2016 年 5 月期间因急性呼吸窘迫/衰竭而入住 PICU 并根据我们预先制定的方案接受 HFNC 作为一线支持和拔管后支持的 1 个月至 18 岁的所有患者。HFNC 失败定义为需要升级为无创通气(NIV)或有创机械通气(MV)。HFNC 应答者和无应答者根据 HFNC 前和 30、60 和 120min、12、24 和 48h 以及治疗结束时获得的临床数据进行比较。

结果

共有 204 例患者(中位数年龄:16.5 个月)参与了研究。26 例(12.7%)患者需要升级(4 例升级为 NIV,22 例升级为 MV)。年龄>120 个月、较高的 PRISM-III 和呼吸评分以及入院时较低的 SpO/FiO(S/F)比值是 HFNC 失败的预测因素。在 60min 时达到 S/F>200 的目标显著预测了 HFNC 的成功。

结论

监测 S/F 比值可能有助于避免延迟升级为另一种通气支持。在 60min 时未能达到 S/F>200 应作为升级呼吸支持的警告。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验