Lin Huiyan, Schulz Claudia, Straube Thomas
Institute of Applied Psychology, Guangdong University of Finance, 510521 Guangzhou, China; Laboratory for Behavioral and Regional Finance, Guangdong University of Finance, 510521 Guangzhou, China; Institute of Medical Psychology and Systems Neuroscience, University of Muenster, 48149 Muenster, Germany.
Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Muenster, 48149 Muenster, Germany.
Biol Psychol. 2017 Oct;129:273-281. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2017.09.011. Epub 2017 Sep 20.
Several studies reported that the encoding and recognition of emotional target faces are modulated by negative contextual expressions. However, it is unknown whether other contextual expressions, such as emotionally ambiguous expressions, affect the encoding and recognition of target faces. To this end, electroencephalography (EEG) was recorded during the presentation of angry or happy target faces after a random sequence of surprised or neutral contextual faces that did not differ in normative valence ratings. Subsequently, participants were asked to perform an unexpected old/new recognition task in which target faces were shown in either the encoded or a non-encoded expression. During the encoding phase, event-related potential (ERP) results showed that surprised as compared to neutral contextual faces led to smaller late positive potentials (LPP) for happy but not for angry target faces. Similar effects were also observed in the N170, even though the interaction of context and target expression failed to reach statistical significance. In the later recognition phase, recognition rates were lower for encoded happy faces when they had been encountered in surprised as compared to neutral context, regardless of whether the target face showed the encoded or a non-encoded expression. However, this context effect was not observed for angry-encoded faces. Taken together, the present study indicates that ambiguous contextual expressions, e.g., surprised faces, affect structural and cognitive encoding and later recognition of happy target faces to a larger extent than neutral contextual faces; whereas angry faces are more resistant to context effects.
多项研究报告称,负面情境表情会调节对带有情绪的目标面孔的编码和识别。然而,尚不清楚其他情境表情,如情绪模糊的表情,是否会影响目标面孔的编码和识别。为此,在呈现惊讶或中性情境面孔的随机序列(二者在规范效价评级上无差异)之后,记录呈现愤怒或开心目标面孔期间的脑电图(EEG)。随后,要求参与者执行一项意外的旧/新识别任务,其中目标面孔以编码或非编码表情呈现。在编码阶段,事件相关电位(ERP)结果显示,与中性情境面孔相比,惊讶情境面孔会使开心目标面孔的晚期正电位(LPP)减小,但对愤怒目标面孔则不然。在N170中也观察到了类似效应,尽管情境与目标表情的交互作用未达到统计学显著性。在随后的识别阶段,当编码的开心面孔在惊讶情境中出现时,与在中性情境中出现相比,其识别率较低,无论目标面孔呈现的是编码表情还是非编码表情。然而,对于编码的愤怒面孔,未观察到这种情境效应。综上所述,本研究表明,模糊的情境表情,如惊讶面孔,比中性情境面孔在更大程度上影响开心目标面孔的结构和认知编码以及随后的识别;而愤怒面孔对情境效应更具抗性。