Merkler Alexander E, Gialdini Gino, Yaghi Shadi, Okin Peter M, Iadecola Costantino, Navi Babak B, Kamel Hooman
From the Clinical and Translational Neuroscience Unit, Feil Family Brain and Mind Research Institute (A.E.M., G.G., C.I., B.B.N., H.K.), Department of Neurology (A.E.M., C.I., B.B.N., H.K.), and Division of Cardiology (P.M.O.), Weill Cornell Medicine, New York; and Department of Neurology, the Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI (S.Y.).
Stroke. 2017 Nov;48(11):3073-3077. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.018501. Epub 2017 Sep 22.
We sought to evaluate the real-world rate of safety outcomes after patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure in patients with ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA).
We performed a retrospective cohort study using administrative claims data on all hospitalizations from 2005 to 2013 in New York, California, and Florida. Using codes, we identified patients who underwent percutaneous transcatheter PFO closure within 1 year of ischemic stroke or TIA. Our outcome was an adverse event occurring during the hospitalization for PFO closure, defined as in prior studies as atrial fibrillation or flutter, cardiac tamponade, pneumothorax, hemothorax, a vascular access complication, or death. Crude rates were reported with exact confidence intervals.
We identified 1887 patients who underwent PFO closure after ischemic stroke or TIA. The rate of any adverse outcome during the hospitalization for PFO closure was 7.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.9%-8.2%). Rates of adverse outcomes varied by age and type of preceding cerebrovascular event. In patients >60 years of age, the rate of adverse outcomes was 10.9% (95% CI, 8.6%-13.6%) versus 4.9% (95% CI, 3.8%-6.3%) in patients ≤60 years of age. The rate of adverse outcomes was 9.9% (95% CI, 7.3%-12.5%) in patients with preceding ischemic stroke versus 5.9% (95% CI, 4.7%-7.1%) after TIA.
Approximately 1 in 14 patients who underwent percutaneous transcatheter PFO closure after ischemic stroke or TIA experienced a serious periprocedural adverse outcome or death. The risk of adverse outcomes was highest in older patients and in those with preceding ischemic stroke.
我们旨在评估缺血性卒中或短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)患者卵圆孔未闭(PFO)封堵术后的实际安全结局发生率。
我们利用纽约、加利福尼亚和佛罗里达州2005年至2013年所有住院患者的行政索赔数据进行了一项回顾性队列研究。通过编码,我们确定了在缺血性卒中或TIA后1年内接受经皮经导管PFO封堵术的患者。我们的结局是PFO封堵住院期间发生的不良事件,如既往研究所定义,包括心房颤动或扑动、心脏压塞、气胸、血胸、血管通路并发症或死亡。报告了带有精确置信区间的粗发生率。
我们确定了1887例在缺血性卒中或TIA后接受PFO封堵术的患者。PFO封堵住院期间任何不良结局的发生率为7.0%(95%置信区间[CI],5.9%-8.2%)。不良结局发生率因年龄和既往脑血管事件类型而异。年龄>60岁的患者不良结局发生率为10.9%(95%CI,8.6%-13.6%),而年龄≤60岁的患者为4.9%(95%CI,3.8%-6.3%)。既往有缺血性卒中的患者不良结局发生率为9.9%(95%CI,7.3%-12.5%),而TIA后为5.9%(95%CI,4.7%-7.1%)。
在缺血性卒中或TIA后接受经皮经导管PFO封堵术的患者中,约每14例中有1例经历了严重的围手术期不良结局或死亡。不良结局风险在老年患者和既往有缺血性卒中的患者中最高。