Bittar Peter G, Nickolich Myles S, Onwuemene Oluwatoyosi A
Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
J Clin Apher. 2018 Jun;33(3):423-426. doi: 10.1002/jca.21590. Epub 2017 Sep 23.
In the implementation of American Society for Apheresis national guidelines, the decision for therapeutic plasma exchange may be confounded by a clinical presentation that fits both a Category I and IV designation. We report the case of a 45-year-old female who presented with concern for a Category IV disorder, gemcitabine-induced thrombotic microangiopathy, and was ultimately diagnosed with a Category I disorder, idiopathic thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura. This case highlights the importance of ruling out idiopathic TTP by a thorough evaluation for ADAMTS13 activity and inhibitor, even when an alternate thrombotic microangiopathy diagnosis may be likely.
在实施美国血液分离学会的国家指南时,治疗性血浆置换的决策可能会因符合I类和IV类指定的临床表现而变得复杂。我们报告了一例45岁女性病例,该患者最初被怀疑患有IV类疾病,即吉西他滨诱导的血栓性微血管病,最终被诊断为I类疾病,即特发性血栓性血小板减少性紫癜。该病例强调了通过全面评估ADAMTS13活性和抑制剂来排除特发性血栓性血小板减少性紫癜的重要性,即使可能存在另一种血栓性微血管病的诊断。