Latour-Pérez J
Servicio de Medicina Intensiva, Hospital General Universitario de Elche, Elche, España; Departamento de Medicina Clínica, Universidad Miguel Hernández, Sant Joan d'Alacant, España.
Med Intensiva (Engl Ed). 2018 Apr;42(3):184-195. doi: 10.1016/j.medin.2017.07.008. Epub 2017 Sep 21.
In the field of Intensive Care Medicine, improved survival has resulted from better patient care, the early detection of clinical deterioration, and the prevention of iatrogenic complications, while research on new treatments has been followed by an overwhelming number of disappointments. The origins of these fiascos must be sought in the conjunction of methodological problems - common to other disciplines - and the particularities of critically ill patients. The present article discusses both aspects and suggests some options for progress.
在重症监护医学领域,患者护理水平的提高、临床病情恶化的早期发现以及医源性并发症的预防带来了生存率的提升,而新治疗方法的研究却带来了大量令人失望的结果。这些失败的根源必须从与其他学科共有的方法学问题以及重症患者的特殊性相结合中去寻找。本文讨论了这两个方面,并提出了一些取得进展的选择。