Lee Anna, Givi Babak, Wu S Peter, Tam Moses M, Gerber Naamit K, Hu Kenneth S, Han Peter, Schreiber David
Department of Radiation Oncology, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY; Department of Veterans Affairs, New York Harbor Healthcare System, Brooklyn, NY.
Department of Otolaryngology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY.
Brachytherapy. 2017 Nov-Dec;16(6):1205-1212. doi: 10.1016/j.brachy.2017.08.012. Epub 2017 Sep 22.
The National Cancer Data Base was analyzed to evaluate the patterns of care and impact of brachytherapy (BT) boost on overall survival (OS) for patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the base of tongue.
Patients with nonmetastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the base of tongue between 2004 and 2012 who received concurrent external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and chemotherapy with or without BT boost in the definitive setting were queried. Overall survival was assessed by the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox regression analysis was used to identify covariates that affected OS.
There were 15,934 patients included in this study; 137 (0.9%) received EBRT + BT and the remaining received EBRT only. Median followup was 41.2 months. The utilization of BT boost declined from 2.1% in 2004 to 0.2% in 2012 (p < 0.0001), whereas intensity-modulated radiation therapy use increased from 22.8% in 2004 to 69.2% in 2012 (p < 0.0001). The three- and 5-year OS was 83.2% and 78.3% for patients receiving EBRT + BT compared with 77.4% and 69.0% for those receiving EBRT only (p = 0.03). The difference in survival was significantly better among patients with T3-4 tumors with EBRT + BT boost (p = 0.009) however, there was no survival benefit among patients with T1-2 tumors (p = 0.72). The analysis was repeated with patients who received intensity-modulated radiation therapy vs. EBRT with BT boost and the survival difference was sustained only for those with T3-4 tumors (p = 0.02).
Brachytherapy boost has decreased in its utilization even though it was associated with favorable survival outcomes particularly among patients with higher T-stage tumors.
分析国家癌症数据库,以评估舌底鳞状细胞癌患者近距离放射治疗(BT)增敏的治疗模式及其对总生存期(OS)的影响。
查询2004年至2012年间接受同期外照射放疗(EBRT)和化疗且在根治性治疗中接受或未接受BT增敏的非转移性舌底鳞状细胞癌患者。采用Kaplan-Meier法评估总生存期。使用Cox回归分析确定影响OS的协变量。
本研究纳入15934例患者;137例(0.9%)接受EBRT + BT,其余仅接受EBRT。中位随访时间为41.2个月。BT增敏的使用率从2004年的2.1%降至2012年的0.2%(p < 0.0001),而调强放射治疗的使用率从2004年的22.8%增至2012年的69.2%(p < 0.0001)。接受EBRT + BT的患者3年和5年总生存率分别为83.2%和78.3%,而仅接受EBRT的患者为77.4%和69.0%(p = 0.03)。接受EBRT + BT增敏的T3 - 4期肿瘤患者生存差异显著更好(p = 0.009),然而,T1 - 2期肿瘤患者无生存获益(p = 0.72)。对接受调强放射治疗与接受EBRT + BT增敏的患者重复进行分析,生存差异仅在T3 - 4期肿瘤患者中持续存在(p = 0.02)。
尽管BT增敏与良好的生存结果相关,尤其是在T分期较高的肿瘤患者中,但它的使用率已下降。