Suppr超能文献

经导管主动脉瓣置换术后抗凝能否避免生物假体亚临床血栓形成?

Could anticoagulation avoid bioprosthesis subclinical thrombosis in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement?

机构信息

Service de cardiologie, CHU de Nantes-Nord Laennec, boulevard Professeur-Jacques-Monod, -44800 Saint-Herblain, France.

Service de cardiologie, CHU de Nantes-Nord Laennec, boulevard Professeur-Jacques-Monod, -44800 Saint-Herblain, France.

出版信息

Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2018 Jan;111(1):25-32. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2017.03.006. Epub 2017 Sep 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite a lack of clear evidence, current European guidelines recommend antiplatelet therapy after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Recent investigations suggest that bioprosthesis thrombosis after TAVR is not uncommon and may be prevented by anticoagulation, but not by antiplatelet therapy.

AIMS

The study objective was to assess the impact of the antithrombotic regimen on post-TAVR early haemodynamics.

METHODS

Patients eligible for TAVR with an Edwards SAPIEN 3 valve were included in this prospective observational study. Patients undergoing long-term anticoagulation before TAVR continued their treatment, whereas previously non-anticoagulated patients received antiplatelet therapy. The primary endpoint was the mean transaortic gradient assessed by transthoracic echocardiography at the first post-TAVR follow-up. Safety was assessed by two composite endpoints: bleeding/vascular complications and major adverse postoperative events.

RESULTS

Among 135 included patients, 78 were discharged on antiplatelet therapy and 57 on anticoagulation. Both groups had similar baseline characteristics, except for supraventricular arrhythmia (7.7% on antiplatelets vs. 89.5% on anticoagulation; P<0.001). At 1-2months after TAVR, the mean transaortic gradient was significantly higher in the antiplatelet therapy group versus the anticoagulation group (13.0±4.0 vs. 9.0±2.8mmHg; P<0.001, independently of prosthesis size). Safety analyses showed no significant differences of the composite endpoints.

CONCLUSION

Prolonged anticoagulation after TAVR was associated with lower early transaortic gradients than antiplatelet therapy. Anticoagulation treatment may limit clinical and subclinical thrombosis without increasing early postoperative complications.

摘要

背景

尽管缺乏明确的证据,但目前的欧洲指南建议在经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)后进行抗血小板治疗。最近的研究表明,TAVR 后生物瓣血栓形成并不罕见,抗凝治疗可能预防,但抗血小板治疗无效。

目的

本研究旨在评估抗血栓治疗方案对 TAVR 后早期血流动力学的影响。

方法

这项前瞻性观察性研究纳入了适合接受爱德华兹 SAPIEN 3 瓣膜 TAVR 的患者。在 TAVR 前长期接受抗凝治疗的患者继续接受治疗,而之前未抗凝的患者则接受抗血小板治疗。主要终点是经胸超声心动图在 TAVR 后首次随访时评估的平均跨主动脉梯度。安全性通过两个复合终点来评估:出血/血管并发症和主要术后不良事件。

结果

在纳入的 135 例患者中,78 例出院时接受抗血小板治疗,57 例出院时接受抗凝治疗。两组患者的基线特征相似,除了室上性心律失常(抗血小板组 7.7%,抗凝组 89.5%;P<0.001)。在 TAVR 后 1-2 个月,抗血小板治疗组的平均跨主动脉梯度明显高于抗凝治疗组(13.0±4.0 比 9.0±2.8mmHg;P<0.001,与假体大小无关)。安全性分析显示,复合终点无显著差异。

结论

TAVR 后延长抗凝治疗与较低的早期跨主动脉梯度相关,而抗血小板治疗则无差异。抗凝治疗可能限制临床和亚临床血栓形成,而不会增加早期术后并发症。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验