Hussain Saad A, Abbas Ashwaq N, Alhadad Hasan A, Al-Jumaili Ali A, Abdulrahman Zainab S
Professor of Pharmacology and Toxicology. Faculty of Pharmacy, Alrafidain University College. Baghdad, (Iraq).
Associate Professor of Clinical Pharmacy. Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Sulaimani. Kurdistan Region (Iraq).
Pharm Pract (Granada). 2017 Jul-Sep;15(3):979. doi: 10.18549/PharmPract.2017.03.979. Epub 2017 Aug 20.
This study evaluated 980 off-label use requests in the private clinical settings within Baghdad area, Iraq from October 2013 to September 2015. The efficacy, safety, and convenience of each drug request and its alternative options were evaluated according to the patient health and demographic characteristics and standard guidelines.
Of the 980 physician off-label requests, only 22.7% were approved by the pharmacists. Rheumatology and Nephrology accounted for the highest ratio of off-label use requests for adults (30.3% and 26.3%). The pharmacist rejection ratio of off-label use was comparable between the two groups (p>0.05). Most of the issued requests were attributed either to unapproved indication or to combination of more than one drug (38% and 35.3%). A low acceptance rate was reported in the requests issued for treatment in different clinical lines to the authorized one (11.9%). The lowest rate of acceptance was reported in the requests that had very low evidence level (9.1%). The mostly prescribed medications were musculoskeletal agents (28.9%). Finally, 78.2% of the requests came from clinical branches for adults. Although the agreement rate for requests in adults was higher than that in pediatrics, the two rates were not significantly different.
Community pharmacists should effectively take responsibility for assessing off-label drug requests in Iraqi private settings. The quality of evidence does not represent the major factor influencing the approval rate of off-label drug use. The availability of safer and/or affordable alternatives and prescribing for a different patient age category highly impacted the pharmacists' approval rate.
1)评估医生与药剂师在药品未按说明书用药方面的一致性关系;2)确定伊拉克巴格达地区私立医疗机构中最常见的未按说明书用药类别/适应症以及开处方的临床学科。
本研究评估了2013年10月至2015年9月伊拉克巴格达地区私立临床机构中的980例未按说明书用药申请。根据患者健康状况和人口统计学特征以及标准指南,对每项用药申请及其替代方案的疗效、安全性和便利性进行评估。
在980例医生提出的未按说明书用药申请中,只有22.7%获得药剂师批准。成人未按说明书用药申请中,风湿病学和肾脏病学占比最高(分别为30.3%和26.3%)。两组未按说明书用药的药剂师拒绝率相当(p>0.05)。大多数已发出的申请要么归因于未获批的适应症,要么归因于一种以上药物的联合使用(分别为38%和35.3%)。针对不同临床科室向获批科室提出的治疗申请接受率较低(11.9%)。证据水平极低的申请接受率最低(9.1%)。最常开具的药物是肌肉骨骼用药(28.9%)。最后,78.2%的申请来自成人临床科室。虽然成人申请的同意率高于儿科,但两者差异不显著。
社区药剂师应切实负责评估伊拉克私立医疗机构中的未按说明书用药申请。证据质量并非影响未按说明书用药批准率的主要因素。更安全和/或更经济实惠的替代药物的可获得性以及针对不同患者年龄组的处方开具对药剂师的批准率有很大影响。