• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

德国新生儿和儿科重症监护病房中高流量鼻导管(HFNC)的使用情况-一项全国性调查。

The use of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) as respiratory support in neonatal and pediatric intensive care units in Germany - A nationwide survey.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, University Hospital of Rostock, Germany.

Department of Neonatology, Südstadt Hospital Rostock, Germany.

出版信息

Respir Med. 2017 Oct;131:210-214. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2017.08.027. Epub 2017 Sep 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.rmed.2017.08.027
PMID:28947032
Abstract

BACKGROUND

High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) is a technique of oxygen supply, initially being used as a potentially less-invasive alternative to nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) for premature infants/neonates, which nowadays crosses the border of neonatal care. HFNC builds up a positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) but lacks the opportunity for continuous monitoring. Therefore, pressure-depending complications are a risk. Our goal was to evaluate the current use of HFNC in Germany regarding indications, techniques of application and complications experienced.

STUDYDESIGN

We used a questionnaire sent to 226 pediatric clinics.

RESULTS

We received responses from 67 pediatric clinics (29.6%). HFNC was applied in the age group of 8 to 14 years in 42% and between 14 and 18 years in 33% of the clinics. 54% of the clinics have been using HFNC for more than 3 years. Applied flow rates varied strongly among the clinics. 70% of the clinics use HFNC outside of the established indications (alternative to nCPAP for premature infants and neonates, bronchiolitis) for pneumonia, support after extubation and non-adherence to nCPAP. Severe complications such as pneumothorax have been seen by 17,9% of the clinics.

CONCLUSION

We reported for the first time a nationwide overview about the expanded use of HFNC in pediatric clinics. Our results emphasize the fact that, even though HFNC is widely accepted as a non-invasive procedure there is still a potential of severe side effects. Therefore the use of HFNC should be monitored continuously and closely within an intensive or intermediate care unit.

摘要

背景

高流量鼻导管(HFNC)是一种供氧技术,最初被用作早产儿/新生儿替代鼻塞持续气道正压通气(nCPAP)的潜在非侵入性方法,如今已跨越新生儿护理的边界。HFNC 会产生正呼气末压(PEEP),但缺乏持续监测的机会。因此,依赖压力的并发症是一种风险。我们的目标是评估德国目前 HFNC 的使用情况,包括适应证、应用技术和所经历的并发症。

研究设计

我们使用了一份发送给 226 家儿科诊所的问卷。

结果

我们收到了 67 家儿科诊所(29.6%)的回复。HFNC 在年龄组为 8 至 14 岁的诊所中应用率为 42%,在 14 至 18 岁的诊所中应用率为 33%。54%的诊所使用 HFNC 已经超过 3 年。应用的流速在各诊所之间差异很大。70%的诊所将 HFNC 用于超出既定适应证的情况(早产儿和新生儿的 nCPAP 替代、细支气管炎),用于肺炎、拔管后的支持和不遵守 nCPAP。17.9%的诊所报告了严重并发症,如气胸。

结论

我们首次报告了全国范围内儿科诊所扩大使用 HFNC 的情况。我们的结果强调了一个事实,即使 HFNC 作为一种非侵入性的治疗方法被广泛接受,但仍存在严重副作用的风险。因此,HFNC 的使用应在重症监护或中级监护病房内进行持续和密切的监测。

相似文献

1
The use of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) as respiratory support in neonatal and pediatric intensive care units in Germany - A nationwide survey.德国新生儿和儿科重症监护病房中高流量鼻导管(HFNC)的使用情况-一项全国性调查。
Respir Med. 2017 Oct;131:210-214. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2017.08.027. Epub 2017 Sep 1.
2
High flow nasal cannula (HFNC) versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) for the initial respiratory management of acute viral bronchiolitis in young infants: a multicenter randomized controlled trial (TRAMONTANE study).高流量鼻导管(HFNC)与经鼻持续气道正压通气(nCPAP)治疗婴幼儿急性病毒性毛细支气管炎的初始呼吸管理:一项多中心随机对照试验(TRAMONTANE 研究)。
Intensive Care Med. 2017 Feb;43(2):209-216. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4617-8. Epub 2017 Jan 26.
3
Oral Feeding for Infants and Children Receiving Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure and High-Flow Nasal Cannula Respiratory Supports: A Survey of Practice.经鼻持续气道正压通气和高流量鼻导管呼吸支持患儿的口腔喂养:实践调查。
Dysphagia. 2020 Jun;35(3):443-454. doi: 10.1007/s00455-019-10047-4. Epub 2019 Aug 26.
4
Non-invasive respiratory support for infants with bronchiolitis: a national survey of practice.毛细支气管炎婴儿的无创呼吸支持:全国实践调查
BMC Pediatr. 2017 Jan 17;17(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12887-017-0785-0.
5
High-Flow Nasal Cannula Utilization in Pediatric Critical Care.高流量鼻导管在儿科重症监护中的应用
Respir Care. 2017 Aug;62(8):1023-1029. doi: 10.4187/respcare.05153. Epub 2017 Jun 6.
6
Comparison between high-flow nasal oxygen cannula and conventional oxygen therapy after extubation in pediatric intensive care unit.儿科重症监护病房拔管后高流量鼻导管吸氧与传统氧疗的比较。
Turk J Pediatr. 2018;60(2):126-133. doi: 10.24953/turkjped.2018.02.002.
7
High-Flow Nasal Cannula versus Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure for Primary Respiratory Support in Preterm Infants with Respiratory Distress: A Randomized Controlled Trial.高流量鼻导管与经鼻持续气道正压通气用于呼吸窘迫早产儿的初始呼吸支持:一项随机对照试验
Neonatology. 2018;113(3):235-241. doi: 10.1159/000484400. Epub 2018 Jan 23.
8
First-line treatment using high-flow nasal cannula for children with severe bronchiolitis: Applicability and risk factors for failure.使用高流量鼻导管对重度细支气管炎患儿进行一线治疗:适用性及治疗失败的风险因素
Arch Pediatr. 2018 Apr;25(3):213-218. doi: 10.1016/j.arcped.2018.01.003. Epub 2018 Mar 15.
9
Modalities and Complications Associated With the Use of High-Flow Nasal Cannula: Experience in a Pediatric ICU.与使用高流量鼻导管相关的方式及并发症:儿科重症监护病房的经验
Respir Care. 2016 Oct;61(10):1305-10. doi: 10.4187/respcare.04452. Epub 2016 Aug 2.
10
High-flow nasal cannula therapy for children with bronchiolitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.高流量鼻导管氧疗在毛细支气管炎患儿中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Arch Dis Child. 2019 Jun;104(6):564-576. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2018-315846. Epub 2019 Jan 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of transnasal humidified rapid-insufflation ventilatory exchange on the incidence of hypoxemia in sedated gastroscopy in children: a randomised controlled trial.经鼻湿化快速充气通气交换对儿童镇静胃镜检查中低氧血症发生率的影响:一项随机对照试验
BMC Pediatr. 2025 Sep 1;25(1):669. doi: 10.1186/s12887-025-06075-9.
2
Epidemiologic evaluation of pediatric patients receiving high-flow nasal cannula therapy in the pediatric emergency department.儿科急诊科接受高流量鼻导管治疗的儿科患者的流行病学评估。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Feb 14;104(7):e41554. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000041554.
3
Evaluating Pressure Variability and Influencing Factors during High-Flow Nasal Cannula Therapy in Premature Infants.
评估早产儿高流量鼻导管治疗期间的压力变异性及影响因素。
Children (Basel). 2024 Aug 15;11(8):995. doi: 10.3390/children11080995.
4
High-flow nasal oxygen in infants and children for early respiratory management of pneumonia-induced acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: the CENTURI randomized clinical trial.高流量鼻导管吸氧用于婴幼儿肺炎所致急性低氧性呼吸衰竭的早期呼吸管理:CENTURI随机临床试验
Intensive Care Med Paediatr Neonatal. 2024;2(1):15. doi: 10.1007/s44253-024-00031-8. Epub 2024 Apr 1.
5
Comparison of the Efficacies of High-Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen Therapy and Non-invasive Nasal Cannula Ventilation in Preventing Intubation.高流量鼻导管吸氧疗法与无创鼻导管通气预防插管的疗效比较
Turk Arch Pediatr. 2024 Mar;59(2):214-220. doi: 10.5152/TurkArchPediatr.2024.23301.
6
High-flow nasal cannula versus continuous positive airway pressure in primary respiratory support for preterm infants: A systematic review and meta-analysis.高流量鼻导管与持续气道正压通气用于早产儿初级呼吸支持的系统评价和荟萃分析
Front Pediatr. 2022 Nov 21;10:980024. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.980024. eCollection 2022.
7
Closed-loop oxygen control improves oxygenation in pediatric patients under high-flow nasal oxygen-A randomized crossover study.闭环氧控制改善高流量鼻导管吸氧下儿科患者的氧合——一项随机交叉研究
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Nov 16;9:1046902. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1046902. eCollection 2022.
8
Treatment of Pediatric Patients With High-Flow Nasal Cannula and Considerations for Oral Feeding: A Review of the Literature.高流量鼻导管治疗小儿患者及口腔喂养注意事项:文献综述
Perspect ASHA Spec Interest Groups. 2022 Apr;7(2):543-552. doi: 10.1044/2021_persp-21-00152. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
9
A Survey of Humidified High-flow Nasal Cannula Usage in Indian Pediatric Intensive Care Units.印度儿科重症监护病房中高流量鼻导管湿化使用情况的调查
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2020 Oct;24(10):996-998. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23628.
10
Best practices, challenges and innovations in pediatrics in 2019.2019 年儿科的最佳实践、挑战和创新。
Ital J Pediatr. 2020 Nov 30;46(1):176. doi: 10.1186/s13052-020-00941-1.