Groves Mark
Departments of Psychiatry and Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mt. Sinai, New York, NY, United States.
Handb Clin Neurol. 2017;144:99-105. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-801893-4.00008-0.
Guidelines in the Huntington disease genetic counseling community have set a standard for the process of at-risk counseling, recommending the involvement of a multidisciplinary team, which includes a psychiatrist or psychologist. Though most studies have been largely reassuring regarding the psychologic consequences of predictive testing, there are individuals presenting to testing who really want something else other than the test results, who are being pressured by others to obtain results, or who remain deeply ambivalent about testing. Particularly concerning are those testing candidates who are highly anxious or depressed at the time of presentation. Balancing the ethical principles of autonomy with beneficence and nonmaleficence requires careful exploration of the motivations behind testing to ensure that all are fully informed of alternatives, and opportunities for further support are offered when needed. This chapter illustrates 13 areas of focus and inquiry in the psychiatric interview and gives some case examples to illustrate an approach to the psychiatric assessment and counseling of highly anxious individuals seeking genetic testing.
亨廷顿舞蹈病遗传咨询领域的指南为风险咨询流程设定了标准,建议由多学科团队参与其中,该团队包括一名精神科医生或心理学家。尽管大多数研究在很大程度上都表明预测性检测对心理的影响令人安心,但仍有一些接受检测的个体,他们真正想要的并非检测结果,而是受到他人压力才去获取结果,或者对检测仍深感矛盾。尤其令人担忧的是那些在就诊时高度焦虑或抑郁的检测候选人。在平衡自主、行善和不伤害这些伦理原则时,需要仔细探究检测背后的动机,以确保所有人都充分了解替代方案,并在需要时提供进一步支持的机会。本章阐述了精神科访谈中13个重点关注和询问的领域,并给出了一些案例,以说明对寻求基因检测的高度焦虑个体进行精神科评估和咨询的方法。