Rao Vivek, Dhanani Sonny, MacLean Janet, Payne Clare, Paltser Elizabeth, Humar Atul, Zaltzman Jeffrey
Division of Cardiovascular Surgery (Rao), Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Division of Critical Care (Dhanani), Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont.; Trillium Gift of Life Network (MacLean, Payne, Paltser); Multiorgan Transplant Unit (Rao, Humar), Toronto General Hospital, University of Toronto; Division of Nephrology (Zaltman), St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.
CMAJ. 2017 Sep 25;189(38):E1206-E1211. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.161043.
To increase the available pool of organ donors, Ontario introduced donation after circulatory determination of death (DCD) in 2006. Other jurisdictions have reported a decrease in donations involving neurologic determination of death (NDD) after implementation of DCD, with a drop in organ yield and quality. In this study, we examined the effect of DCD on overall transplant activity in Ontario.
We examined deceased donor and organ transplant activity during 3 distinct 4-year eras: pre-DCD (2002/03 to 2005/06), early DCD (2006/07 to 2009/10) and recent DCD (2010/11 to 2013/14). We compared these donor groups by categorical characteristics.
Donation increased by 57%, from 578 donors in the pre-DCD era to 905 donors in the recent DCD era, with a 21% proportion (190/905) of DCD donors in the recent DCD era. However, overall NDD donation also increased. The mean length of hospital stay before declaration for NDD was 2.7 days versus 6.0 days before withdrawal of life support and subsequent asystole in cases of DCD. The average organ yield was 3.73 with NDD donation versus 2.58 with DCD ( < 0.001). Apart from hearts, all organs from DCD donors were successfully transplanted. From the pre-DCD era to the recent DCD era, transplant activity in each era increased for all solid-organ recipients, including heart (from 158 to 216), kidney (from 821 to 1321), liver (from 477 to 657) and lung (from 160 to 305).
Implementation of DCD in Ontario led to increased transplant activity for all solid-organ recipients. There was no evidence that the use of DCD was pre-empting potential NDD donation. In contrast to groups receiving other organs, heart transplant candidates have not yet benefited from DCD.
为增加器官捐献者库,安大略省于2006年引入了循环判定死亡后捐献(DCD)。其他司法管辖区报告称,实施DCD后,涉及神经学判定死亡(NDD)的捐献有所减少,器官产量和质量下降。在本研究中,我们考察了DCD对安大略省总体移植活动的影响。
我们考察了3个不同的4年时间段内的已故捐献者和器官移植活动:DCD之前(2002/03至2005/06)、早期DCD(2006/07至2009/10)和近期DCD(2010/11至2013/14)。我们按分类特征对这些捐献者组进行了比较。
捐献增加了57%,从DCD之前时期的578名捐献者增至近期DCD时期的905名捐献者,近期DCD时期的DCD捐献者占比为21%(190/905)。然而,总体NDD捐献也有所增加。NDD宣告前的平均住院时间为2.7天,而DCD病例中撤掉生命支持及随后出现心搏停止前的平均住院时间为6.0天。NDD捐献的平均器官产量为3.73,而DCD为2.58(P<0.001)。除心脏外,DCD捐献者的所有器官均成功移植。从DCD之前时期到近期DCD时期,每个时期所有实体器官受者的移植活动均有所增加,包括心脏(从158例增至216例)、肾脏(从821例增至1321例)、肝脏(从477例增至657例)和肺(从160例增至305例)。
安大略省实施DCD导致所有实体器官受者的移植活动增加。没有证据表明DCD的使用抢占了潜在的NDD捐献。与接受其他器官的受者群体不同,心脏移植候选者尚未从DCD中获益。