Orthopaedic Research Center Amsterdam, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery of the Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, 1100 DE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Orthopedics of the Tergooi hospital, Hilversum, The Netherlands.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 Jun;26(6):1751-1758. doi: 10.1007/s00167-017-4721-5. Epub 2017 Sep 25.
Malalignment of implants is a major source of failure during total knee arthroplasty. To achieve more accurate 3D planning and execution of the osteotomy cuts during surgery, the Signature (Biomet, Warsaw) patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) was used to produce pin guides for the positioning of the osteotomy blocks by means of computer-aided manufacture based on CT scan images. The research question of this study is: what is the transfer accuracy of osteotomy planes predicted by the Signature PSI system for preoperative 3D planning and intraoperative block-guided pin placement to perform total knee arthroplasty procedures?
The transfer accuracy achieved by using the Signature PSI system was evaluated by comparing the osteotomy planes predicted preoperatively with the osteotomy planes seen intraoperatively in human cadaveric legs. Outcomes were measured in terms of translational and rotational errors (varus, valgus, flexion, extension and axial rotation) for both tibia and femur osteotomies.
Average translational errors between the osteotomy planes predicted using the Signature system and the actual osteotomy planes achieved was 0.8 mm (± 0.5 mm) for the tibia and 0.7 mm (± 4.0 mm) for the femur. Average rotational errors in relation to predicted and achieved osteotomy planes were 0.1° (± 1.2°) of varus and 0.4° (± 1.7°) of anterior slope (extension) for the tibia, and 2.8° (± 2.0°) of varus and 0.9° (± 2.7°) of flexion and 1.4° (± 2.2°) of external rotation for the femur.
The similarity between osteotomy planes predicted using the Signature system and osteotomy planes actually achieved was excellent for the tibia although some discrepancies were seen for the femur. The use of 3D system techniques in TKA surgery can provide accurate intraoperative guidance, especially for patients with deformed bone, tailored to individual patients and ensure better placement of the implant.
在全膝关节置换术中,植入物的对线不良是失败的主要原因。为了更准确地进行手术中的截骨切割 3D 规划和执行,使用 Signature(Biomet,华沙)患者特定器械(PSI)通过计算机辅助制造基于 CT 扫描图像为截骨块的定位生产销引导器,从而实现截骨平面的更精确 3D 规划和执行。本研究的研究问题是:Signature PSI 系统预测的截骨平面在术前 3D 规划和术中截骨块引导销放置中对全膝关节置换术的准确性如何?
通过比较术前预测的截骨平面与在人体尸体腿上术中看到的截骨平面,评估使用 Signature PSI 系统获得的截骨平面转移精度。结果以胫骨和股骨截骨的平移和旋转误差(内翻、外翻、屈曲、伸展和轴向旋转)来衡量。
使用 Signature 系统预测的截骨平面与实际截骨平面之间的平均平移误差为胫骨 0.8 毫米(±0.5 毫米),股骨 0.7 毫米(±4.0 毫米)。与预测和实际截骨平面相关的平均旋转误差为胫骨内翻和前斜率(伸展)0.1°(±1.2°)和 0.4°(±1.7°),股骨内翻和屈曲 2.8°(±2.0°)和 0.9°(±2.7°)和外旋 1.4°(±2.2°)。
尽管对于股骨存在一些差异,但 Signature 系统预测的截骨平面与实际截骨平面之间的相似性对于胫骨非常出色。3D 系统技术在 TKA 手术中的应用可以提供准确的术中指导,尤其是对于畸形骨的患者,根据个体患者量身定制,并确保植入物更好地放置。