[A comparative study of the calcaneal closing-wedge calcaneal osteotomy versus posterior-superior prominence removal in both sides with Haglund syndrome].

To compare the clinical outcome of removal of calcaneal posterior-superior prominence and that of calcaneal closing-wedge osteotomy for Haglund syndrome. From February 2009 to July 2014, 36 patients with Haglund syndrome were included.They were divided into two groups, and each group included 18 patients and underwent removal of calcaneal posterior-superior prominence and calcaneal closing-wedge osteotomy respectively.They were evaluated preoperatively and after 6 , 12 months and 24 months postoperatively by American Orthopedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, VAS score, VISA-A questionnaire and Maryland Foot Score.Fowler-Philip angle and calcaneal posterior slope of the two groups were compared preoperatively and after 6 months.All data were analysis utilizing SPSS 18.0. At six months of follow-up, the weight-bearing lateral X-rays reveals that removal of calcaneal posterior-superior prominence did not change Fowler-Philip angle and calcaneal posterior slope and calcaneal closing-wedge osteotomy decreased Fowler-Philip angle and calcaneal posterior slope significantly[from preoperation (56.5±5.4)°, (120.0±1.3)°to postoperation (48.4±4.6)°, (109.0±5.3)°]. At six months of follow-up, the AOFAS score, VAS score, VISA-A questionnaire and Maryland Foot Score were worse in the wedge calcaneal osteotomy group.At twelve months of follow-up, no significant difference (>0.05)was found between the two groups in terms of VAS score, and Maryland Foot Score, while the AOFAS score, and VISA-A questionnaire in the wedge calcaneal osteotomy group were better than those of posterior-superior prominence removal group.At twenty-four months of follow-up, the AOFAS score, VAS score, VISA-A questionnaire and Maryland Foot Score were better in the wedge calcaneal osteotomy group (<0.05). Both the two surgical methods are effective for Haglund syndrome.Calcaneal closing-wedge osteotomy decreased Fowler-Philip angle and calcaneal posterior slope of calcaneus and its clinical outcome appears better than that removal of calcaneal posterior-superior prominence.