Suppr超能文献

大型翼手目蝙蝠在攀爬和行走运动方面与小型翼手目蝙蝠有着极大的不同:进化意义。

Megachiropteran bats profoundly unique from microchiropterans in climbing and walking locomotion: Evolutionary implications.

作者信息

Adams Rick A, Carter Richard T

机构信息

School of Biological Sciences, University of Northern Colorado, Greeley, Colorado, United States of America.

Department of Biology, University of Dayton, Dayton, Ohio, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2017 Sep 28;12(9):e0185634. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185634. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

Understandably, most locomotor analyses of bats have focused on flight mechanics and behaviors. However, we investigated nonflight locomotion in an effort to glean deeper insights into the evolutionary history of bats. We used high-speed video (300 Hz) to film and compare walking and climbing mechanics and kinematics between several species of the suborders Megachiroptera (Pteropodidae) versus Microchiroptera (Vespertilionidae and Phyllostomatidae). We found fundamentally distinctive behaviors, functional abilities, and performance outcomes between groups, but nearly homogeneous outcomes within groups. Megachiropterans exhibited climbing techniques and skills not found in microchiropterans and which aligned with other fully arboreal mammals. Megachiropterans climbed readily when placed in a head-up posture on a vertical surface, showed significantly greater ability than microchiropterans to abduct and extend the reach of their limbs, and climbed at a greater pace by using a more aggressive ipsilateral gait, at times being supported by only a single contact point. In addition, megachiropterans showed little ability to employ basic walking mechanics when placed on the ground, also a pattern observed in some highly adapted arboreal mammals. Conversely, microchiropterans resisted climbing vertical surfaces in a head-up posture, showed significantly less extension of their limbs, and employed a less-aggressive, slower contralateral gait with three points of contact. When walking, microchiropterans used the same gait they did when climbing which is representative of basic tetrapod terrestrial mechanics. Curiously, megachiropterans cycled their limbs significantly faster when climbing than when attempting to walk, whereas microchiropterans cycled their limbs at significantly faster rates when walking than when climbing. We contend that nonflight locomotion mechanics give a deep evolutionary view into the ancestral es locomotor platform on which flight was built in each of these groups.

摘要

可以理解的是,大多数对蝙蝠的运动分析都集中在飞行力学和行为上。然而,我们研究了非飞行运动,以期更深入地了解蝙蝠的进化历史。我们使用高速视频(300赫兹)拍摄并比较了大蝙蝠亚目(狐蝠科)与小蝙蝠亚目(蝙蝠科和叶口蝠科)几种物种之间的行走和攀爬力学及运动学。我们发现不同类群之间在行为、功能能力和表现结果上存在根本差异,但同一类群内部的结果几乎一致。大蝙蝠表现出小蝙蝠所没有的攀爬技巧,这些技巧与其他完全树栖的哺乳动物一致。当大蝙蝠以头朝上的姿势置于垂直表面时,它们能轻松攀爬,在肢体外展和伸展方面的能力明显强于小蝙蝠,并且通过更具攻击性的同侧步态攀爬速度更快,有时仅靠一个接触点支撑。此外,大蝙蝠在地面上时几乎无法运用基本的行走力学,这也是一些高度适应树栖生活的哺乳动物中观察到的模式。相反,小蝙蝠抗拒以头朝上的姿势攀爬垂直表面,肢体伸展明显较少,采用攻击性较小、速度较慢的对侧步态且有三个接触点。行走时,小蝙蝠使用与攀爬时相同的步态,这代表了基本的四足陆地力学。奇怪的是,大蝙蝠攀爬时肢体循环运动的速度明显快于试图行走时,而小蝙蝠行走时肢体循环运动的速度明显快于攀爬时。我们认为,非飞行运动力学为深入了解这些类群中各自飞行所基于的祖先运动平台提供了进化视角。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c4e/5619802/1b0fe9605e61/pone.0185634.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验