Kim Hee Chul
School of Social Welfare, University at Albany, State University of New York, Richardson Hall R184, 135 Western Avenue, Albany, NY 12222.
Soc Work. 2017 Oct 1;62(4):305-311. doi: 10.1093/sw/swx045.
In this era of neoliberalism, social work in the United States is arguably overly professionalized and privatized, and has almost lost its activists roots in working for social justice. Radical social work rooted in macro-level community-based practice has been in crisis over the past three decades. The rise of socially engaged art has become more prominent in the United States even as social work has strayed away from its basic tenets such as community practice, advocacy, and social action. How should the social work profession interpret the rise of socially engaged art-already a trend in the art world-whose modality and purpose resembles radical social work? By comparing and contrasting the similarities and differences between radical social work and socially engaged art, this article examines the possibility of consilience between the two and the implications for the social work profession.
在这个新自由主义时代,美国的社会工作可以说是过度专业化和私有化了,几乎已失去其为社会正义而努力的激进主义根源。过去三十年来,植根于宏观层面社区实践的激进社会工作一直处于危机之中。在美国,社会参与艺术的兴起变得更加显著,而与此同时,社会工作却背离了其诸如社区实践、倡导和社会行动等基本原则。社会工作专业应如何解读社会参与艺术(这在艺术界已然是一种趋势)的兴起呢?其形式和目的与激进社会工作相似。通过比较和对比激进社会工作与社会参与艺术之间的异同,本文探讨了二者达成契合的可能性以及对社会工作专业的启示。