Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Eulji University Hospital, Daejeon, South Korea.
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Feb;33(2):470-476. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.08.043. Epub 2017 Sep 7.
In the early days when delta ceramics were developed, there was a period of using delta ceramic liner and alumina ceramic head. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to investigate the clinical and radiological outcomes of total hip arthroplasty using delta ceramic liner on alumina ceramic head after a minimum of 10 years of follow-up and to evaluate problems of early delta ceramic liner.
Alumina on delta cementless total hip arthroplasty was performed in 92 hips (85 patients) from August 2005 to March 2007 at our hospital. Bilateral total hip arthroplasty were performed in 7 patients, 30 patients on the left side and 48 patients on the right side. Preoperative diagnosis was osteonecrosis of the femoral head in 34 hips (37%), degenerative arthritis in 31 hips (33.7%), femur neck fracture in 21 hips (22.8%), and rheumatoid arthritis in 6 hips (6.5%). All surgeries were carried out with anterolateral approach. For the clinical evaluation, Harris hip score (HHS), pain, and range of motion were assessed. Radiographs were reviewed by the authors to search for any signs of osteolysis, loosening of implants, and heterotopic ossification.
HHS was compared between preoperative and final follow-ups. The mean HHS improved from preoperative 58.3 points (range 27-76) to 92.7 points (range 78-98) on the final follow-up (P = .02). The mean range of hip motion at the final follow-up was flexion 116.9°, adduction 23.8°, abduction 34.6°, internal rotation 16.3°, and external rotation 39.2°. As for the postoperative pain, 1 patient complained of inguinal pain and 4 patients complained of thigh pain. Because of trauma, 3 cases of dislocation were observed in all cases. There are 3 cases with dislocation and 2 cases were treated with conservative treatment without recurrence, but 1 case was required for surgical treatment due to eccentric rim wear of delta liner. The aseptic loosening of acetabular cup and femoral stem was each 1 hip.
Alumina head-on-delta liner cementless THA, using a large femoral head 32-36 mm in diameter, demonstrated satisfactory clinical and radiological results in the minimum 10 years of follow-up. Eccentric rim wear can occur even in delta ceramic liners that are known to have high strength, and this can lead to dislocation which can, in turn, increase the possibility of linear fracture.
在开发 delta 陶瓷的早期,曾经有过一段时间使用 delta 陶瓷衬垫和氧化铝陶瓷头。因此,本研究的目的是在至少 10 年的随访后,调查使用 delta 陶瓷衬垫的氧化铝陶瓷头全髋关节置换术的临床和影像学结果,并评估早期 delta 陶瓷衬垫的问题。
2005 年 8 月至 2007 年 3 月,我院对 92 髋(85 例)进行了 delta 水泥固定非骨水泥全髋关节置换术。7 例患者行双侧全髋关节置换术,其中 3 例为左侧,48 例为右侧。术前诊断为股骨头坏死 34 髋(37%),退行性关节炎 31 髋(33.7%),股骨颈骨折 21 髋(22.8%),类风湿关节炎 6 髋(6.5%)。所有手术均采用前外侧入路。临床评估采用 Harris 髋关节评分(HHS)、疼痛和活动范围。作者对 X 线片进行了回顾,以寻找任何骨溶解、假体松动和异位骨化的迹象。
比较术前和最终随访时的 HHS。最终随访时 HHS 从术前的 58.3 分(27-76 分)改善至 92.7 分(78-98 分)(P=.02)。最终随访时髋关节活动范围平均为屈曲 116.9°,内收 23.8°,外展 34.6°,内旋 16.3°,外旋 39.2°。术后疼痛方面,1 例患者诉腹股沟区疼痛,4 例患者诉大腿疼痛。由于外伤,所有病例均发生 3 例脱位。脱位 3 例,保守治疗无复发 2 例,1 例因 delta 衬垫偏心边缘磨损需手术治疗。髋臼杯和股骨柄的无菌性松动各 1 例。
使用直径 32-36mm 的大股骨头的氧化铝头-on-delta 衬垫非骨水泥全髋关节置换术,在至少 10 年的随访中取得了满意的临床和影像学结果。即使是已知强度较高的 delta 陶瓷衬垫也可能发生偏心边缘磨损,这可能导致脱位,从而增加线性骨折的可能性。