Batman B, van Bladel E R, van Hamersveld M, Pasker-de Jong P C M, Korporaal S J A, Urbanus R T, Roest M, Boven L A, Fijnheer R
Department of Internal Medicine, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, The Netherlands.
Department of Clinical Chemistry, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, The Netherlands.
Vox Sang. 2017 Nov;112(8):773-779. doi: 10.1111/vox.12557. Epub 2017 Sep 29.
Prophylactic platelet transfusions are administered to prevent bleeding in haemato-oncological patients. However, bleeding still occurs, despite these transfusions. This practice is costly and not without risk. Better predictors of bleeding are needed, and flow cytometric evaluation of platelet function might aid the clinician in identifying patients at risk of bleeding. This evaluation can be performed within the hour and is not hampered by low platelet count. Our objective was to assess a possible correlation between bleeding and platelet function in thrombocytopenic haemato-oncological patients.
Inclusion was possible for admitted haemato-oncology patients aged 18 years and above. Furthermore, an expected need for platelet transfusions was necessary. Bleeding was graded according to the WHO bleeding scale. Platelet reactivity to stimulation by either adenosine diphosphate (ADP), cross-linked collagen-related peptide (CRP-xL), PAR1- or PAR4-activating peptide (AP) was measured using flow cytometry.
A total of 114 evaluations were available from 21 consecutive patients. Platelet reactivity in response to stimulation by all four studied agonists was inversely correlated with significant bleeding. Odds ratios (OR) for bleeding were 0·28 for every unit increase in median fluorescence intensity (MFI) [95% confidence interval (CI) 0·11-0·73] for ADP; 0·59 [0·40-0·87] for CRP-xL; 0·59 [0·37-0·94] for PAR1-AP; and 0·43 [0·23-0·79] for PAR4-AP. The platelet count was not correlated with bleeding (OR 0·99 [0·96-1·02]).
Agonist-induced platelet reactivity was significantly correlated to bleeding. Platelet function testing could provide a basis for a personalized transfusion regimen, in which platelet transfusions are limited to those at risk of bleeding.
预防性血小板输注用于预防血液肿瘤患者出血。然而,尽管进行了这些输注,出血仍会发生。这种做法成本高昂且并非没有风险。需要更好的出血预测指标,血小板功能的流式细胞术评估可能有助于临床医生识别有出血风险的患者。该评估可在一小时内完成,且不受血小板计数低的影响。我们的目的是评估血小板减少的血液肿瘤患者出血与血小板功能之间的可能相关性。
纳入18岁及以上的住院血液肿瘤患者。此外,有必要预期需要进行血小板输注。根据世界卫生组织出血量表对出血进行分级。使用流式细胞术测量血小板对二磷酸腺苷(ADP)、交联胶原相关肽(CRP-xL)、PAR1或PAR4激活肽(AP)刺激的反应性。
连续21例患者共获得114次评估结果。所有四种研究激动剂刺激后血小板的反应性与严重出血呈负相关。ADP刺激后,中位荧光强度(MFI)每增加一个单位,出血的比值比(OR)为0.28[95%置信区间(CI)0.11-0.73];CRP-xL为0.59[0.40-0.87];PAR1-AP为0.59[0.37-0.94];PAR4-AP为0.43[0.23-0.79]。血小板计数与出血无关(OR为0.99[0.96-1.02])。
激动剂诱导的血小板反应性与出血显著相关。血小板功能检测可为个性化输血方案提供依据,在该方案中,血小板输注仅限于有出血风险的患者。