Department of General Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
Children's Hospital Association, Lenexa, Kans.
Acad Pediatr. 2018 May-Jun;18(4):390-396. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2017.09.015. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
Hospitalizations for ambulatory care-sensitive conditions (ACSC) are measured to indicate health care system quality, with the premise that fewer hospitalizations would occur with better preceding outpatient care. Our objectives were to identify outpatient care received in the 7 days preceding acute pediatric hospitalizations and to compare receipt of outpatient care by hospitalization type (ACSC vs non-ACSC).
This retrospective observational study used a 10-state database of Medicaid claims to identify outpatient visits within 7 days before acute unplanned hospitalization for children aged 0 to 17 years. We used logistic regression to assess the relationship between hospitalization type and occurrence of a preceding outpatient clinic visit, controlling for patient age, race/ethnicity, type of Medicaid, and complex chronic conditions.
Of 254,902 hospitalizations, 28.6% had a preceding outpatient visit. Thirty-five percent of hospitalizations were for ACSC. A greater percentage of ACSC versus non-ACSC hospitalizations had a preceding outpatient visit (31.1% vs 27.3%, P < .001). In multivariable analysis, characteristics associated with a preceding outpatient visit were age <1 versus 13 to 17 years (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.4; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.3-2.5), ≥2 vs 0 complex chronic conditions (aOR 1.9; 95% CI 1.8-2.0), Medicaid managed care versus fee for service (aOR 1.2; 95% CI 1.2-1.3), and ACSC versus non-ACSC hospitalization (aOR 1.2; 95% CI 1.1-1.2).
Although receipt of outpatient care was modestly higher in children hospitalized with an ACSC, most hospitalized children did not receive preceding outpatient care. Further investigation is needed to assess why such a large proportion of children do not receive outpatient care before acute unplanned hospitalization, especially for ACSC.
通过衡量可门诊治疗的急性病(ACSC)的住院情况来评估医疗保健系统的质量,其前提是如果提供更好的门诊治疗,住院人数将会减少。我们的目标是确定急性儿科住院前 7 天内接受的门诊治疗,并比较不同住院类型(ACSC 与非 ACSC)的门诊治疗接受情况。
本回顾性观察性研究使用了一个由 10 个州的医疗补助索赔数据组成的数据库,以确定 0 至 17 岁儿童因急性非计划住院前 7 天内的门诊就诊情况。我们使用逻辑回归评估了住院类型与门诊就诊之间的关系,控制了患者年龄、种族/族裔、医疗补助类型和复杂慢性病等因素。
在 254902 例住院中,有 28.6%的患者在住院前有门诊就诊。35%的住院是 ACSC。与非 ACSC 住院相比,更多的 ACSC 住院有门诊就诊(31.1%比 27.3%,P < 0.001)。在多变量分析中,与门诊就诊相关的特征是年龄 <1 岁与 13 至 17 岁(调整后的优势比 [aOR] 2.4;95%置信区间 [CI] 2.3-2.5)、≥2 个与 0 个复杂慢性病(aOR 1.9;95% CI 1.8-2.0)、医疗补助管理式医疗与按服务收费(aOR 1.2;95% CI 1.2-1.3)以及 ACSC 与非 ACSC 住院(aOR 1.2;95% CI 1.1-1.2)。
尽管 ACSC 住院患儿的门诊治疗接受程度略高,但大多数住院患儿未接受门诊治疗。需要进一步研究以评估为什么如此大比例的儿童在急性非计划住院前未接受门诊治疗,尤其是对于 ACSC。