• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

药品参考价格市场中的分层共付额、定价和需求。

Tiered co-payments, pricing, and demand in reference price markets for pharmaceuticals.

机构信息

Duesseldorf Institute for Competition Economics (DICE), Heinrich Heine University, Germany.

TILEC and Department of Economics, Tilburg University, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Health Econ. 2017 Dec;56:19-29. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2017.08.008. Epub 2017 Sep 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.jhealeco.2017.08.008
PMID:28964941
Abstract

Health insurance companies curb price-insensitive behavior and the moral hazard of insureds by means of cost-sharing, such as tiered co-payments or reference pricing in drug markets. This paper evaluates the effect of price limits - below which drugs are exempt from co-payments - on prices and on demand. First, using a difference-in-differences estimation strategy, we find that the new policy decreases prices by 5 percent for generics and increases prices by 4 percent for brand-name drugs in the German reference price market. Second, estimating a nested-logit demand model, we show that consumers appreciate co-payment exempt drugs and calculate lower price elasticities for brand-name drugs than for generics. This explains the different price responses of brand-name and generic drugs and shows that price-related co-payment tiers are an effective tool to steer demand to low-priced drugs.

摘要

医疗保险公司通过共付额分级或药品市场的参考定价等成本分担方式来抑制价格不敏感行为和被保险人的道德风险。本文评估了价格限制(低于该价格的药品免于共付额)对价格和需求的影响。首先,我们使用双重差分估计策略发现,新政策使德国参考价格市场中的仿制药价格降低了 5%,而品牌药价格则上涨了 4%。其次,通过嵌套逻辑需求模型估计,我们表明消费者对免共付额的药品有更高的评价,并计算出品牌药的价格弹性低于仿制药,这解释了品牌药和仿制药价格反应的不同,并表明与价格相关的共付额层级是引导需求转向低价药品的有效工具。

相似文献

1
Tiered co-payments, pricing, and demand in reference price markets for pharmaceuticals.药品参考价格市场中的分层共付额、定价和需求。
J Health Econ. 2017 Dec;56:19-29. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2017.08.008. Epub 2017 Sep 15.
2
Reference pricing with endogenous generic entry.具有内生仿制药进入的参考定价
J Health Econ. 2016 Dec;50:312-329. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2016.04.003. Epub 2016 Jun 8.
3
Can income-based co-payment rates improve disparity? The case of the choice between brand-name and generic drugs.基于收入的共付率能否改善差距?品牌药和仿制药选择的案例。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Nov 1;19(1):780. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4598-8.
4
Regulation of pharmaceutical prices: evidence from a reference price reform in Denmark.药品价格监管:来自丹麦参考价格改革的证据
J Health Econ. 2014 Jul;36:174-87. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2014.04.003. Epub 2014 May 9.
5
Prediction of Change in Prescription Ingredient Costs and Co-payment Rates under a Reference Pricing System in South Korea.韩国参考定价系统下处方成分成本和共付率变化的预测
Value Health Reg Issues. 2017 May;12:7-19. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2016.07.011. Epub 2017 Jan 28.
6
Effects of innovation and insurance coverage on price elasticity of demand for prescription drugs: some empirical lessons in pharmacoeconomics.创新与保险覆盖范围对处方药需求价格弹性的影响:药物经济学中的一些实证教训
J Med Econ. 2020 Sep;23(9):915-922. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2020.1772797. Epub 2020 Jun 25.
7
More cost-sharing, less cost? Evidence on reference price drugs.
Health Econ. 2023 Feb;32(2):413-435. doi: 10.1002/hec.4627. Epub 2022 Nov 22.
8
Influence of patient co-payments on atypical antipsychotic choice in Poland: implications once generic atypicals are available.波兰患者自付费用对非典型抗精神病药物选择的影响:一旦出现非专利非典型药物的影响。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2011 Mar 1;9(2):101-10. doi: 10.2165/11318840-000000000-00000.
9
Physician and Patient Adjustment to Reference Pricing for Drugs.医生和患者对药品参考定价的调整。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Feb 5;3(2):e1920544. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.20544.
10
Changes in Retail Prices of Prescription Dermatologic Drugs From 2009 to 2015.2009 年至 2015 年处方皮肤科药物零售价格变化。
JAMA Dermatol. 2016 Feb;152(2):158-63. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2015.3897.

引用本文的文献

1
Copayment Adjustments Under Bundled and Two-Tiered Pricing: Welfare Implications for Outpatient Care in Taiwanese Hospitals.捆绑定价和两级定价下的共付额调整:对台湾医院门诊护理的福利影响
Inquiry. 2025 Jan-Dec;62:469580251366876. doi: 10.1177/00469580251366876. Epub 2025 Aug 31.
2
Explaining why increases in generic use outpace decreases in brand name medicine use in multisource markets and the role of regulation.解释多来源市场中仿制药使用增加超过品牌药使用减少的原因和监管的作用。
PLoS One. 2024 May 2;19(5):e0301716. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301716. eCollection 2024.
3
A systematic review of strategies used for controlling consumer moral hazard in health systems.
系统评价用于控制医疗体系中消费者道德风险的策略。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Oct 18;22(1):1260. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08613-y.
4
Demand-side Interventions to Control Moral Hazard in Health Systems, Beneficial or Detrimental: A Systematic Review Study.控制卫生系统中道德风险的需求侧干预措施:有益还是有害?一项系统评价研究
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2022 Jun 27;36:69. doi: 10.47176/mjiri.36.69. eCollection 2022.
5
Pharmaceutical pricing dynamics in an internal reference pricing system: evidence from changing drugs' reimbursements.内部参考定价体系中的药品定价动态:来自药品报销变化的证据。
Eur J Health Econ. 2022 Dec;23(9):1497-1518. doi: 10.1007/s10198-022-01440-2. Epub 2022 Feb 22.
6
Age Structural Transitions and Copayment Policy Effectiveness: Evidence from Taiwan's National Health Insurance System.年龄结构转型与共同支付政策效果:来自台湾全民健康保险制度的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 12;17(12):4183. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17124183.
7
If reference-based benefit designs work, why are they not widely adopted? Insurers and administrators not doing enough to address price variation.如果基于参考的福利设计行之有效,为何未被广泛采用?保险公司和管理人员在应对价格差异方面做得不够。
Health Serv Res. 2020 Jun;55(3):344-347. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13284. Epub 2020 Mar 29.