1Sustainable Agri-Food Sciences Division,Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute,Large park,Hillsborough BT26 6DR,UK.
3Biometrics and Information Systems Branch,Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute,18a Newforge Lane,Belfast BT9 5PX,UK.
Animal. 2018 May;12(5):1102-1110. doi: 10.1017/S1751731117002282. Epub 2017 Oct 2.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of using different floor types to accommodate growing and finishing beef cattle on their performance, cleanliness, carcass characteristics and meat quality. In total, 80 dairy origin young bulls (mean initial live weight 224 kg (SD=28.4 kg)) were divided into 20 blocks with four animals each according to live weight. The total duration of the experimental period was 204 days. The first 101 days was defined as the growing period, with the remainder of the study defined as the finishing period. Cattle were randomly assigned within blocks to one of four floor type treatments, which included fully slatted flooring throughout the entire experimental period (CS); fully slatted flooring covered with rubber strips throughout the entire experimental period (RS); fully slatted flooring during the growing period and moved to a solid floor covered with straw bedding during the finishing period (CS-S) and fully slatted flooring during the growing period and moved to fully slatted flooring covered with rubber strips during the finishing period (CS-RS). Bulls were offered ad libitum grass silage supplemented with concentrates during the growing period. During the finishing period, bulls were offered concentrates supplemented with chopped barley straw. There was no significant effect of floor type on total dry matter intake (DMI), feed conversion ratio, daily live weight gain or back fat depth during the growing and finishing periods. Compared with bulls accommodated on CS, RS and CS-RS, bulls accommodated on CS-S had a significantly lower straw DMI (P<0.01). Although bulls accommodated on CS and CS-S were significantly dirtier compared with those accommodated on RS and CS-RS on days 50 (P<0.05) and 151 (P<0.01), there was no effect of floor type on the cleanliness of bulls at the end of the growing and finishing periods. There was also no significant effect of floor type on carcass characteristics or meat quality. However, bulls accommodated on CS-S had a tendency for less channel, cod and kidney fat (P=0.084) compared with those accommodated on CS, RS and CS-RS. Overall, floor type had no effect on the performance, cleanliness, carcass characteristics or meat quality of growing or finishing beef cattle.
本研究旨在评估不同地板类型对育肥和出栏肉牛生产性能、清洁度、胴体特征和肉质的影响。共选择 80 头奶牛场来源的青年公牛(平均初始活重 224kg(SD=28.4kg)),根据活重分为 20 个区组,每个区组 4 头动物。整个实验期共 204 天。前 101 天为育肥期,其余时间为育肥后期。各区组内的动物随机分配到 4 种地板类型处理组之一,包括整个实验期完全铺设漏缝地板(CS);整个实验期完全铺设漏缝地板并覆盖橡胶条(RS);育肥期完全铺设漏缝地板,育肥后期改为铺设铺满稻草的实心地板(CS-S);育肥期完全铺设漏缝地板,育肥后期改为铺设铺满橡胶条的漏缝地板(CS-RS)。育肥期,牛群自由采食青贮饲草,并补充精饲料;育肥后期,牛群自由采食精饲料,并补充切碎的大麦秸秆。地板类型对生长和育肥期的总干物质采食量(DMI)、饲料转化率、日增重和背膘深度没有显著影响。与 CS、RS 和 CS-RS 处理组相比,CS-S 处理组的牛对秸秆的采食量显著降低(P<0.01)。尽管 CS 和 CS-S 处理组的牛在第 50 天(P<0.05)和第 151 天(P<0.01)时明显比 RS 和 CS-RS 处理组的牛脏,但生长和育肥后期,地板类型对牛的清洁度没有影响。地板类型对胴体特征和肉质也没有显著影响。然而,CS-S 处理组的牛的通道脂肪、肾脏周脂肪和腹部脂肪的含量有降低的趋势(P=0.084),低于 CS、RS 和 CS-RS 处理组的牛。总体而言,地板类型对育肥和出栏肉牛的生产性能、清洁度、胴体特征和肉质没有影响。