Department of Ophthalmology, AZ Sint-Jan, Bruges, Belgium.
Federation of Ocular Infectious Diseases, Centre Hospitalier National d'Ophtalmologie des 15-20, Paris, France; Institut de la Vision, INSERM, University Paris, Paris, France.
Ophthalmology. 2018 Feb;125(2):161-168. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.08.037. Epub 2017 Sep 29.
To determine in vivo confocal microscopy diagnostic criteria to diagnose Acanthamoeba keratitis (AK) using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) as the reference diagnostic technique.
Retrospective case-control study. Data were recorded prospectively and analyzed retrospectively.
Fifty patients with PCR-positive AK (study group) and 50 patients with bacterial, fungal, viral, or immune keratitis featuring negative Acanthamoeba PCR results (control group).
In vivo confocal microscopy performed at the acute stage of keratitis.
Presence of in vivo confocal microscopy images suggestive of AK. Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine the relationship between types of images and presence of PCR-positive AK.
The following 4 types of images were associated significantly with PCR-positive AK (P < 0.05): bright spots (round or ovoid hyperreflective objects with no double wall; diameter, <30 μm); target images (hyperreflective objects with hyporeflective halo; diameter, <30 μm); clusters of hyperreflective objects (diameter, <30 μm); and trophozoite-like objects (diameter, >30 μm). Specificity of both target and trophozoite images was 100%. This figure was 98.2% for clusters and 48.2% for bright spots. If the diagnosis of AK was made on presence of target images, clusters or trophozoite images (at least 1 of the 3 features), the positive predictive value of confocal microscopy was 87.5% and the negative predictive value was 58.5%.
Acanthamoeba keratitis is a serious vision-threatening disease. In vivo confocal microscopy can help in this challenging diagnosis, especially when PCR is delayed, shows negative results, or is not available. Target images and trophozoite-like images are pathognomonic of AK. Clusters of hyperreflective objects are highly specific of AK. However, the overall sensitivity of in vivo confocal microscopy features of AK is low. In addition to the clinical features, microbiological tests (direct examination and cultures of corneal scrapings), and PCR, in vivo confocal microscopy allows for more rapid diagnosis and treatment initiation, potentially leading to an improved outcome.
确定使用聚合酶链反应(PCR)作为参考诊断技术的体内共聚焦显微镜诊断棘阿米巴角膜炎(AK)的标准。
回顾性病例对照研究。数据前瞻性记录并回顾性分析。
50 例 PCR 阳性 AK 患者(研究组)和 50 例细菌、真菌、病毒或免疫性角膜炎患者,PCR 检测棘阿米巴阴性(对照组)。
在角膜炎急性期进行体内共聚焦显微镜检查。
存在提示 AK 的体内共聚焦显微镜图像。多变量逻辑回归用于确定不同图像类型与 PCR 阳性 AK 之间的关系。
以下 4 种图像与 PCR 阳性 AK 显著相关(P<0.05):亮斑(无双层的圆形或卵圆形高反射性物体;直径<30 μm);靶图像(高反射性物体伴低反射性晕;直径<30 μm);高反射性物体簇(直径<30 μm);滋养体样物体(直径>30 μm)。靶图像和滋养体样图像的特异性均为 100%。簇图像和亮斑图像的特异性分别为 98.2%和 48.2%。如果 AK 的诊断基于靶图像、簇或滋养体样图像(至少有 3 种特征中的 1 种)的存在,则共聚焦显微镜的阳性预测值为 87.5%,阴性预测值为 58.5%。
棘阿米巴角膜炎是一种严重威胁视力的疾病。体内共聚焦显微镜有助于诊断这种具有挑战性的疾病,特别是在 PCR 延迟、结果阴性或不可用时。靶图像和滋养体样图像是 AK 的特征性表现。高反射性物体簇高度提示 AK。然而,AK 的体内共聚焦显微镜特征的总体敏感性较低。除了临床特征外,微生物学检查(角膜刮片直接检查和培养)和 PCR 外,体内共聚焦显微镜还可实现更快速的诊断和治疗启动,从而可能改善预后。