• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

应用美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)预后分期手册时乳腺癌分期的变化:一项中国队列的回顾性分析

Changes of breast cancer staging when AJCC prognostic staging manual is used: a retrospective analysis of a Chinese cohort.

作者信息

Ding Jinhua, Wu Weizhu, Fang Jianjiang, Chu Yudong, Zheng Siming, Jiang Li

机构信息

1 Department of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Ningbo Medical Center Lihuili Eastern Hospital, Ningbo - PR China.

2 Department of Emergency Medicine, Ningbo Medical Center Lihuili Eastern Hospital, Ningbo - PR China.

出版信息

Int J Biol Markers. 2018 May;33(2):168-173. doi: 10.5301/ijbm.5000302. Epub 2017 Sep 25.

DOI:10.5301/ijbm.5000302
PMID:28967067
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to investigate staging changes for Chinese breast cancer patients assessed by the 7 (anatomic) and 8 (prognostic) editions of the AJCC staging manual, and to explore the predictive factors for these changes.

METHODS

Data of patients who received curative surgery for stage I-III breast cancer at Ningbo Medical Center Lihuili Eastern Hospital were retrospectively reviewed. The assessment of staging was according to the criteria of the 7 and 8 editions of the AJCC staging manual. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to analyze the associations between staging changes and clinicopathological characteristics.

RESULTS

Staging changes were found in 59.37% of patients and were more likely to be seen in stage IIIA (96.10%) and IIA (85.94%), then IIB (70.33%), IB (68.75%), followed by IA (36.17%) and IIIC (30.08%). In univariate analysis, staging changes were associated with tumor location, clinical tumor size, clinical axillary lymph node status and Ki67 index. However, multivariate analysis found that staging changes were significantly associated with tumor size >2 cm (odds ratio [OR] = 3.263, 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 2.638-4.036), lymph node involvement (OR = 2.261, 95% CI, 1.830-2.794) and high Ki-67 index (OR = 1.661, 95% CI 1.343-2.054).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrated that there were marked staging changes when 2 different editions of the AJCC staging manual were used. Since prognostic biomarkers are available in routine clinical practice, the more recent staging manual should be followed to select better systemic therapy and give better outcomes for Chinese breast cancer patients.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在调查依据美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)分期手册第7版(解剖学分期)和第8版(预后分期)评估的中国乳腺癌患者的分期变化,并探索这些变化的预测因素。

方法

回顾性分析在宁波医疗中心李惠利东部医院接受I-III期乳腺癌根治性手术患者的数据。分期评估依据AJCC分期手册第7版和第8版的标准。进行单因素和多因素逻辑回归分析,以分析分期变化与临床病理特征之间的关联。

结果

59.37%的患者出现分期变化,其中IIIA期(96.10%)和IIA期(85.94%)患者的分期变化更为常见,其次是IIB期(70.33%)、IB期(68.75%),随后是IA期(36.17%)和IIIC期(30.08%)。单因素分析显示,分期变化与肿瘤位置、临床肿瘤大小、临床腋窝淋巴结状态和Ki67指数相关。然而,多因素分析发现,分期变化与肿瘤大小>2 cm(比值比[OR]=3.263,95%置信区间[95%CI],2.638-4.036)、淋巴结受累(OR=2.261,95%CI,1.830-2.794)和高Ki-67指数(OR=1.661,95%CI 1.343-2.054)显著相关。

结论

我们的研究表明,使用2个不同版本的AJCC分期手册时存在明显的分期变化。由于在常规临床实践中可获得预后生物标志物,对于中国乳腺癌患者,应遵循最新的分期手册来选择更好的全身治疗方案并获得更好的治疗效果。

相似文献

1
Changes of breast cancer staging when AJCC prognostic staging manual is used: a retrospective analysis of a Chinese cohort.应用美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)预后分期手册时乳腺癌分期的变化:一项中国队列的回顾性分析
Int J Biol Markers. 2018 May;33(2):168-173. doi: 10.5301/ijbm.5000302. Epub 2017 Sep 25.
2
Prognostic Factors for Luminal B-like Breast Cancer.腔面 B 型乳腺癌的预后因素。
Curr Med Sci. 2019 Jun;39(3):396-402. doi: 10.1007/s11596-019-2049-8. Epub 2019 Jun 17.
3
The comparison of the anatomic stage and pathological prognostic stage according to the AJCC 8th edition for the prognosis in Japanese breast cancer patients: data from a single institution.根据第 8 版 AJCC 对日本乳腺癌患者预后的解剖分期和病理预后分期比较:单机构数据。
Breast Cancer. 2020 Nov;27(6):1137-1146. doi: 10.1007/s12282-020-01116-w. Epub 2020 May 29.
4
Determinants of lymph node status in women with breast cancer: A hospital based study from eastern India.印度东部一项基于医院的研究:乳腺癌女性患者淋巴结状态的决定因素
Indian J Med Res. 2016 May;143(Supplement):S45-S51. doi: 10.4103/0971-5916.191761.
5
Correlation of proliferative index with various clinicopathologic prognostic parameters in primary breast carcinoma: A study from North India.原发性乳腺癌增殖指数与各种临床病理预后参数的相关性:一项来自印度北部的研究。
J Cancer Res Ther. 2018 Apr-Jun;14(3):537-542. doi: 10.4103/0973-1482.167614.
6
Predictive parameters for internal mammary node drainage in patients with early breast cancer.早期乳腺癌患者内乳淋巴结引流的预测参数。
Tumori. 2014 May-Jun;100(3):254-8. doi: 10.1700/1578.17194.
7
The assessment of 8th edition AJCC prognostic staging system and a simplified staging system for breast cancer: The analytic results from the SEER database.第8版美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)乳腺癌预后分期系统及简化分期系统的评估:来自监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库的分析结果
Breast J. 2019 Sep;25(5):838-847. doi: 10.1111/tbj.13347. Epub 2019 Jun 13.
8
Comparison of primary breast cancer and paired metastases: biomarkers discordance influence on outcome and therapy.原发性乳腺癌与配对转移瘤的比较:生物标志物不一致对结局和治疗的影响。
Future Oncol. 2018 Apr;14(9):849-859. doi: 10.2217/fon-2017-0384. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
9
Overview of breast cancer collaborative stage data items--their definitions, quality, usage, and clinical implications: a review of SEER data for 2004-2010.乳腺癌协作分期数据项概述——其定义、质量、用途及临床意义:对2004 - 2010年监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据的回顾
Cancer. 2014 Dec 1;120 Suppl 23:3771-80. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29059.
10
Marked lymphovascular invasion, progesterone receptor negativity, and high Ki67 labeling index predict poor outcome in breast cancer patients treated with endocrine therapy alone.显著的淋巴管浸润、孕激素受体阴性以及高Ki67标记指数预示着仅接受内分泌治疗的乳腺癌患者预后不良。
Breast Cancer. 2014 Mar;21(2):214-22. doi: 10.1007/s12282-012-0380-z. Epub 2012 Jun 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Validation of the Prognostic Stage from the American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th Staging Manual in Luminal B-Like Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Breast Cancer.美国癌症联合委员会第8版分期手册中管腔B样人表皮生长因子受体2阴性乳腺癌预后分期的验证
Cancer Manag Res. 2022 Feb 21;14:719-728. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S342918. eCollection 2022.
2
Genomic Profiling Comparison of Germline and Non- Carriers Reveals Amplification as a Risk Factor for Non- Carriers in Patients With Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.胚系携带者与非携带者的基因组分析比较揭示了扩增是三阴性乳腺癌患者中非携带者的一个风险因素。
Front Oncol. 2020 Oct 30;10:583314. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.583314. eCollection 2020.
3
Impact of biomarkers and genetic profiling on breast cancer prognostication: A comparative analysis of the 8th edition of breast cancer staging system.
生物标志物和基因谱分析对乳腺癌预后的影响:第八版乳腺癌分期系统的比较分析
Breast J. 2019 Sep;25(5):829-837. doi: 10.1111/tbj.13352. Epub 2019 Jun 13.